Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site!

Go Back   Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums > Political Issues > Religion and Politics

Religion and Politics Discuss how Religion has and does affect the world we live in.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2008, 08:12 PM
Jojo's Avatar
Advisor
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Userid: 686
Posts: 1,824
Rep Power: 2
Jojo has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lancer View Post
Are you saying that terrorist attacks are justifiable? I hope not! Or are you just making excuses for them?

Let's go back a bit and ask what were the reasons for the attack on civilians in Bali or the original bombing of the World Trade centre in 1993. Both carried out by Islamic terrorists. Both before the invasion of Iraq or action in Afghanistan. Islamic terrorism didn't start with 9/11. It's been going on for decades.

BTW, it was the Arabs who first attacked the Israelis, let's not forget that. It has always been the Arabs who want to see Israel pushed into the sea. And I would disagree that Britain and the US support the violence in Palestine. They have both made several efforts to broker peace deals. Blame the intrasigence of the Israelis and Palestinians who are as bad as each other.
Well, the point most people try to forget is that the arabs did fight on the side of the nazis. There was some wholesale country making and breaking - redefining all sorts of borders - Israel is just one case. An equally sensitive one - as the recent attack in India shows - is Kashmir was given to India during the split of that area into two countries - India and Pakistan. That makes the ruling class Hindu and the underclass mainly Moslem.

So if the Israelis all go peacefully into the coean and drown - there will still be nuclear warfare between muslim and hindu nations.
__________________
Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.
Ernest Benn
Reply With Quote
  #82 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2008, 08:25 PM
Jojo's Avatar
Advisor
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Userid: 686
Posts: 1,824
Rep Power: 2
Jojo has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leviathon435 View Post
Neither, I'm stating what prompted them not justifying or excusing them.



Very true, but the amount of terrorist attacks has risen hugely since the wars/invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, and there has always been western imperialism in the middle east, the Afghanistan and Iraq are nothing but a continuance of this. Again I'm not condoning or excusing terrorist actions but merely stating why they have occured, along with the natural tendency some humans have for destruction and killing which will always exist.



I'll blame the intransigence of the Israeli and Palestinian leaders if you wish, but not the people themselves, on both sides they are the ones who suffer. Interesting you've gone to the most simple of all arguments, the one 5 year olds use to defend their actions: "they started it" and in this case it's perfectly debateable. But I won't argue the point with you, either way the violence going on from both sides is unjustifiable. The difference is that one side is being supported with trade, politically and even with arms, by Britain and the US.

Point of fact - the palestinians did start it before Israel existed - and the arab countries fought on the side of the nazis. Second fact - look at how much we give in aid to arab countries and you'll see it's a lot more even than politics would tell you.

Here's some history - A Bunch of Pages: US Aid to Israel - do Egypt and KSA figure?

Israel has received more direct aid from the United States since World War II than any other country, but the amounts for the first half of this period were relatively small. Between 1949 and 1973, the U.S. provided Israel with an average of about $122 million a year, a total of $3.1 billion (and actually more than $1 billion of that was loans for military equipment in 1971-73) . Prior to 1971, Israel received a total of only $277 million in military aid, all in the form of loans as credit sales. The bulk of the economic aid was also lent to Israel. By comparison, the Arab states received nearly three times as much aid before 1971, $4.4 billion, or $170 million per year. Moreover, unlike Israel, which receives nearly all its aid from the United States, Arab nations have gotten assistance from Asia, Eastern Europe, the Soviet Union and the European Community.

Yes, the aid to Israel during the first period was substantial, before it became enormous! What is conveniently forgotten, is that during this period, Europe under the guilt of the Holocaust was supporting and aiding Israel as zealously as the US. Stalin too had understandings with the Zionist State, as the transfer of the Jewish population from SU to Palestine suited the racist ideologies of both Stalin and the Jewish Agency.


Israel did not begin to receive large amounts of assistance until 1974, following the 1973 war, and the sums increased dramatically after the Camp David agreements. Altogether, since 1949, Israel has received more than $90 billion in assistance. Though the totals are impressive, the value of assistance to Israel has been eroded by inflation.
The 1973 war was hardly a loss for Israel to necessitate huge military aid to save a weak state. The 1973 war was, rather the decisive war in which Soviet and American military equipment, especially electronic warfare equipment competed in a real situation. The Soviet advantage in this field that was displayed in the early stages of the war was effectively beaten down very quickly. While the Arab states depended on military purchases from a closed entity, the Israeli side had access to the latest stuff right out of American labs. How the value of assistance has been eroded by inflation is anybody's guess. I thought 1973 dollars were worth more according to inflation.


Arab states that have signed agreements with Israel have also been rewarded. Since signing the peace treaty with Israel, Egypt has been the second largest recipient of U.S. foreign aid ($2 billion in 2002, Israel received $2.8 billion). Jordan has also been the beneficiary of higher levels of aid since it signed a treaty with Israel (increasing from less than $40 million to more than $225 million). The multibillion dollar debts to the U.S. of both Arab nations were also forgiven.

Here's the congressional report on aide abroad. 403 Forbidden
__________________
Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.
Ernest Benn
Reply With Quote
  #83 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2008, 08:31 PM
Jojo's Avatar
Advisor
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Userid: 686
Posts: 1,824
Rep Power: 2
Jojo has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jafar00 View Post
I disagree. DOn't forget, the Zionists waltzed in to Palestine and started kicking people out of their homes at gunpoint and terrorist attacks. If the Zionists came in and coexisted peacefully without prejudicing the rights of the local population as per the Balfour agreement, things would be very different.
Horse doo-doo

There are good people who want peace on both sides - there are bad people who want to kill to gain territory on both sides. In some areas there was coexistance - which is why there are so many palestinian Israelis - and ironically the arabs with the most protected civil rights in the ME are the Israeli ones.
__________________
Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.
Ernest Benn
Reply With Quote
  #84 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2008, 11:41 PM
Zephyr's Avatar
Obama's Socialist Goon
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 58
Location: Wouldn't you like to know.
Age: 16
Posts: 4,334
Rep Power: 7
Zephyr is a jewel in the roughZephyr is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Horse doo-doo
Not really, people really were kicked out of their homes. I know a Palestinian who lives in Lebanon now but knows my friend's family, who was a kid when her and her parents were forced out.
__________________
"Moreover, I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states...Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial "outside agitator" idea. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds."



~Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Reply With Quote
  #85 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2008, 02:14 AM
Jojo's Avatar
Advisor
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Userid: 686
Posts: 1,824
Rep Power: 2
Jojo has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zephyr View Post
Not really, people really were kicked out of their homes. I know a Palestinian who lives in Lebanon now but knows my friend's family, who was a kid when her and her parents were forced out.
My husband's family are Syrian/Lebanese - we were bringing some folks over during the bombing. People like to oversimplify and create villains on one side - there is more than one side here. There is both villainy and pain enough for both sides, and before the creation of Israel by the Balfour declaration and the UN.

Please note this is about the Palestine of the British mandate which included Transjordan (now Jordan) and Israel, and the ugliness between the Jewish commmunity and the arabs was already an issue. BTW - there has been a continuous Jewish presence in that area since Roman times - so some of what you would call Palestinians were Jews.

Quote:
British Empire: The Map Room: Middle East: Palestine

The fact that the British mandate included references to the Balfour Declaration and the establishment of a Jewish homeland was a severe blow to the Arabs. Partly to try and mollify this disappointment, the British split the Palestine mandate into two distinct areas, using the Jordan River as a natural boundary. The British claimed that Jewish immigration would be confined to the West of the river. The East of the river, which represented three quarters of the whole mandate area was to be reserved for the Arabs alone. The Hashemite Abdulla was to become the ruler of what was to become Transjordan. Most Arabs still felt ill at ease with this British plan. They regarded Transjordan as little more than an arid, empty desert. Besides, the principle of any Jewish homeland anywhere in Arab lands was still completely abhorrent to them.

Arab intransigence and unwillingness to work with the Jews was demonstrated almost immediately as the British tried to set up a legislative council and a constitution. The council was supposed to have ten of the seats allocated to the Arabs and only two to the Jews. The Arabs refused to cooperate on the basis that two seats for so few Jews meant that they were relatively over represented. They also resented the comments and concessions made to Zionism in the constitution. This failure meant that the British had no choice but to continue ruling Palestine directly themselves.

Over the next few years, the British made repeated attempts to include both communities in the day to day running of the mandate. Time and time again, Arab intransigence resulted in an absolute refusal to cooperate in any way. Conversely, the Jews were happy to work and cooperate with the authorities and thus gained a legitimacy and administrative experience far and above that which the size of their community merited. The best example of this was the creation of a Jewish agency in 1929. Arabs flatly refused to do the same.

In fact, 1929 saw the birth of the first real instance of communal ugliness. It would set off a trend that would keep rearing its ugly head for nearly as long as the British were in control of the mandate. The Wailing Wall incident was when Arabs and Jews clashed over a stretch of wall that was regarded as religiously important to both religions. Arabs tried to make access to this wall for the Jews as awkward and difficult as possible. In the end, fights broke out which flared into riots around the country. Some 133 Jews were killed (mostly by British authorities) and 116 Arabs died.
There's a lot more at the souce - a UK and neutral one.

If we want to debate this we should start a thread - not sure if it belongs in religion.
__________________
Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.
Ernest Benn
Reply With Quote
  #86 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2008, 12:07 AM
Zephyr's Avatar
Obama's Socialist Goon
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 58
Location: Wouldn't you like to know.
Age: 16
Posts: 4,334
Rep Power: 7
Zephyr is a jewel in the roughZephyr is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
My husband's family are Syrian/Lebanese - we were bringing some folks over during the bombing. People like to oversimplify and create villains on one side - there is more than one side here. There is both villainy and pain enough for both sides, and before the creation of Israel by the Balfour declaration and the UN.
Interesting how you simply deflected that without really answering to anything.
__________________
"Moreover, I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states...Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial "outside agitator" idea. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds."



~Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Reply With Quote
  #87 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2008, 04:20 AM
Citizen
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Userid: 580
Location: England
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 1
Andy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Is Islam compatible with a modern, tolerant society?
No it is not. How can it be when situations like this commonly exist?


An Afghan lawyer defending a journalist on death row in Kabul has been bombarded with death threats urging him to drop the case. Islamic extremists have repeatedly threatened to murder Afzal Nooristani after he agreed to defend Sayed Pervez Kambaksh in a high-profile appeal against his death sentence.

The defendant’s crime? The 23-year-old student writer was sentenced to death for circulating an article about women's rights. He was tried in a closed court, and denied a defence lawyer.


Islamists threaten to murder lawyer defending Pervez - Asia, World - The Independent


In the lands of Islam, tolerance appears to be a word that is neither recognised or practised.
__________________
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery. Sir Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #88 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2008, 06:06 AM
Michael's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 166
Location: Sierra Mountains
Posts: 7,381
Rep Power: 8
Michael has a spectacular aura about
Default

My case in point would be the woman that was hanged in Iran. Her crime was at her "trial" - which means being brought before a religious leader who has total control in assessing the case. She spoke up in her own defense. The religious leader regaurded this as disrespectful.

However, all the Muslims I have known in America are secular oriented and appreciate the standard of living in America. They do not follow the ultra traditional ways of the mideast and do not support terrorism.
__________________
National Debt =
Reply With Quote
  #89 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2008, 06:53 PM
Jojo's Avatar
Advisor
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Userid: 686
Posts: 1,824
Rep Power: 2
Jojo has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zephyr View Post
Interesting how you simply deflected that without really answering to anything.

Interesting how you obviously didn't follow up on the broader picture with a neutral link - or your own links. I mentioned family that had been rescued from bombing by the Israelis - but also pointed out that there were two sides doing wrong.

You tell me that because you know someone who knows someone who was kicked out of their home you believe the only problem in the mideast is that "the Zionists waltzed in to Palestine and started kicking people out of their homes at gunpoint and terrorist attacks." I still think that statement is horse doo-doo, and I posted why I think so.

If you care to make your question more obvious, I will happily answer to it - however, be aware that I am quite convinced there are very few conflicts in the world where only one side is at fault.
__________________
Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.
Ernest Benn
Reply With Quote
  #90 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2008, 12:30 AM
Zephyr's Avatar
Obama's Socialist Goon
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 58
Location: Wouldn't you like to know.
Age: 16
Posts: 4,334
Rep Power: 7
Zephyr is a jewel in the roughZephyr is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Interesting how you obviously didn't follow up on the broader picture with a neutral link - or your own links. I mentioned family that had been rescued from bombing by the Israelis - but also pointed out that there were two sides doing wrong.

You tell me that because you know someone who knows someone who was kicked out of their home you believe the only problem in the mideast is that "the Zionists waltzed in to Palestine and started kicking people out of their homes at gunpoint and terrorist attacks." I still think that statement is horse doo-doo, and I posted why I think so.

If you care to make your question more obvious, I will happily answer to it - however, be aware that I am quite convinced there are very few conflicts in the world where only one side is at fault.
Oh, good, you aren't a total pro-Israel nut.

I have largely the same view of this whole thing as you.
__________________
"Moreover, I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states...Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial "outside agitator" idea. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds."



~Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On






     Top Political Sites  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 PM.
Political Fever 2007/2008
   Word Search   |   Family Friendly   |   AdSense Forum   |   Game Cheats   |   Coupon Codes   |   Spore Game   |   Xcode Forum   |   Political Forums   |   Internet Marketing   |   Social Networking    |   Sudoku   |   Mobile Marketing   |   Web Forms   |   Articles & News   |   Loans & Credit Repair   |   Online Coupon Codes   |   Loans   |   Sudoku Puzzles   |   Map Games   |   Spore Screenshots