Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site!

Go Back   Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums > Political Issues > Religion and Politics

Religion and Politics Discuss how Religion has and does affect the world we live in.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 01:55 PM
Chan's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 133
Location: Buffalo, New York, USA
Posts: 3,750
Rep Power: 4
Chan will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Technocratic_Utilitarian View Post
The fact that it was watched on PBS is irrelevant.
Actually, what the original poster saw (and linked) was something on YouTube or MySpace or something like that - not a valid source like PBS.

Quote:
The video actually gets worse when you watch the DVD of it. Not better.
And if he had actually seen the DVD he'd have a valid basis to criticize the content.

Quote:
The "standards" for homeschooling are often poor or poorly enforced in the United States.
And your evidence of this is?

Quote:
That's why you can have parents nominally cover "evolution" but then teach creationism as the "real" theory. They can purchase specific religious content from organizations like Discovery Institute and give only cursory recognition to valid scientific theories.
But the state standards for homeschooling don't dictate that they MUST teach a specific theory or viewpoint. So, that really isn't an example of poor enforcement.
__________________
A panda walks into a cafe. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and fires two shots in the air.

"Why?" asks the confused waiter, as the panda makes toward the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder.

"I'm a panda," he says at the door. "Look it up."

The waiter turns to the relevant entry and, sure enough, finds an explanation.

"Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves."

Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 02:01 PM
Technocratic_Utilitarian's Avatar
Defender of Reason
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 91
Location: New Jersey
Age: 23
Posts: 1,611
Rep Power: 2
Technocratic_Utilitarian is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
But the state standards for homeschooling don't dictate that they MUST teach a specific theory or viewpoint. So, that really isn't an example of poor enforcement.
And that's piss poor home schooling standards. If you can teach "creationism" in the science curriculum and virtually ignore evolution, the standard is a joke, period. The state standards are crap then, which proves my point for me. It's too lenient. It gets worse though. Here's an example of just how crappy home schooling quality standards are:

"According to the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), an advocacy group for home schooling that has been instrumental in getting more permissive home school legislation passed in many states, 25 of the 50 states have no regulations governing home schooling except a requirement that parents notify a local public authority that they have set up a home school." Moreover, "of these 25 states, (ten) do not even require parental notification."

Essentially, the home school system is a free for all in 25 of the 50 stages, given there are virtually no regulations governing quality in a half of them. Of that half, 10 don't even need to notify a public school nearby that they are going to use home schooling. At best, all the parentso do is go "lolz, I am gonna home school!" and create Jesus Camp. That's poor, just as I said it is.

There aren't even good statistics on the quality of instruction. This should be no surprise, given 10 states don't even require anyone to be notified of homeschooling.

Another interesting fact is that many of the statistics that show home schoolers do well...are unreliable and biased. For example, some studies indicate that home schoolers did better than public schoolers on the Iowa Scholastic Achievement test. What the home school associations didn't bother to say is that not everyone takes this test, often, the test is in an uncontrolled home environment..given by the parents, and almost 10,000 volunteers opted out. This is absurd.

http://www.stanford.edu/~reich/other...ing%202005.pdf
__________________

Last edited by Technocratic_Utilitarian : 06-18-2008 at 02:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 02:26 PM
Chan's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 133
Location: Buffalo, New York, USA
Posts: 3,750
Rep Power: 4
Chan will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Technocratic_Utilitarian View Post
And that's piss poor home schooling standards. If you can teach "creationism" in the science curriculum and virtually ignore evolution, the standard is a joke, period. The state standards are crap then, which proves my point for me. It's too lenient. It gets worse though. Here's an example of just how crappy home schooling quality standards are:

"According to the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), an advocacy group for home schooling that has been instrumental in getting more permissive home school legislation passed in many states, 25 of the 50 states have no regulations governing home schooling except a requirement that parents notify a local public authority that they have set up a home school." Moreover, "of these 25 states, (ten) do not even require parental notification."

Essentially, the home school system is a free for all in 25 of the 50 stages, given there are virtually no regulations governing quality in a half of them. Of that half, 10 don't even need to notify a public school nearby that they are going to use home schooling. At best, all the parentso do is go "lolz, I am gonna home school!" and create Jesus Camp. That's poor, just as I said it is.

There aren't even good statistics on the quality of instruction. This should be no surprise, given 10 states don't even require anyone to be notified of homeschooling.

Another interesting fact is that many of the statistics that show home schoolers do well...are unreliable and biased. For example, some studies indicate that home schoolers did better than public schoolers on the Iowa Scholastic Achievement test. What the home school associations didn't bother to say is that not everyone takes this test, often, the test is in an uncontrolled home environment..given by the parents, and almost 10,000 volunteers opted out. This is absurd.

http://www.stanford.edu/~reich/other...ing%202005.pdf
Now, here's a link where you can find state-by-state information on the curriculum standards: State Core Curriculum Standards

Here are some relatively recent changes made in New York State:

2/14/05 - Home Instruction Field Memo from JAK & JDP
__________________
A panda walks into a cafe. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and fires two shots in the air.

"Why?" asks the confused waiter, as the panda makes toward the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder.

"I'm a panda," he says at the door. "Look it up."

The waiter turns to the relevant entry and, sure enough, finds an explanation.

"Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves."

Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 02:37 PM
Technocratic_Utilitarian's Avatar
Defender of Reason
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 91
Location: New Jersey
Age: 23
Posts: 1,611
Rep Power: 2
Technocratic_Utilitarian is on a distinguished road
Default

A lot of states, as my article indicated, have poor or nonexistent standards, and home school agencies want it to stay that way. Some do not. Your website has links to 50 states, and when you click on them, you get their State DoE website listing the standards for public education. The information is available to all, even if they don't look at it.

The one source doesn't even describe anything in detail (standards). It barely mentions them and largely talks about college degrees. It only gives cursory mentions of home schooling. It says to be a college candidate, they require at least 6 credits of science. Yea. One state allowed the home schoolers to use "Discovery Institute" science packets that taught evolution was "just a theory" and that the earth was 6,000 years old. That was their "natural science" requirement.
__________________

Last edited by Technocratic_Utilitarian : 06-18-2008 at 02:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 02:45 PM
Chan's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 133
Location: Buffalo, New York, USA
Posts: 3,750
Rep Power: 4
Chan will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Technocratic_Utilitarian View Post
A lot of states, as my article indicated, have poor or nonexistent standards, and home school agencies want it to stay that way. Some do not. Your website has links to 50 states, and when you click on them, you get their State DoE website listing the standards for public education. The information is available to all, even if they don't look at it. Showing, say, NY standards doesn't refute the fact that 10 don't even require notification and 25 are either so poorly regulated or not regulated at all.

That's like pointing out beating your children isn't bad if one person ends up turning out okay.
But then I provided the second link:

Here are some relatively recent changes made in New York State:

2/14/05 - Home Instruction Field Memo from JAK & JDP

Quote:
I will trust my standford university source over homeschool.com, though. Thx.
But since Stanford is a leftist school...
__________________
A panda walks into a cafe. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and fires two shots in the air.

"Why?" asks the confused waiter, as the panda makes toward the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder.

"I'm a panda," he says at the door. "Look it up."

The waiter turns to the relevant entry and, sure enough, finds an explanation.

"Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves."

Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 02:53 PM
Technocratic_Utilitarian's Avatar
Defender of Reason
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 91
Location: New Jersey
Age: 23
Posts: 1,611
Rep Power: 2
Technocratic_Utilitarian is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chan View Post
But then I provided the second link:

Here are some relatively recent changes made in New York State:

Quote:
But since Stanford is a leftist school...
Uh-huh. Whatever. If you say so, okay. Irrelevant, still. It's a credible academic source. Moreover, the other source you provided doesn't contradict my source anyway. In fact, it's vague as hell and only covers 1 state. I never all states have no standards. I said many have poor regulations, poor standards for homeschooling. They do.

Regardless, the guy wasn't some leftwinger. He supports private school vouchers and home schooling, jut regulated home schooling. So your attempt to ad hominem him, thus discrediting what he says, fails anyway.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 03:05 PM
Donkey Jote's Avatar
Sinner
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 205
Location: Ohio
Age: 19
Posts: 2,892
Rep Power: 3
Donkey Jote will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Technocratic_Utilitarian View Post
The fact that it was watched on PBS is irrelevant. The video actually gets worse when you watch the DVD of it. Not better.

The "standards" for homeschooling are often poor or poorly enforced in the United States. That's why you can have parents nominally cover "evolution" but then teach creationism as the "real" theory. They can purchase specific religious content from organizations like Discovery Institute and give only cursory recognition to valid scientific theories.
You can make the same, or similar, criticisms about plenty of public schools. The only difference is that a parent is only inflicting their ignorance on their own children rather than a classroom.


The only thing you are doing in this thread is demonstrating your remarkable (but common, really) ignorance about homeschooling.
__________________
"Have you no decency, sir? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?"
-Joseph Welch
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 03:27 PM
Chan's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 133
Location: Buffalo, New York, USA
Posts: 3,750
Rep Power: 4
Chan will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Technocratic_Utilitarian View Post
Uh-huh. Whatever. If you say so, okay. Irrelevant, still. It's a credible academic source. Moreover, the other source you provided doesn't contradict my source anyway. In fact, it's vague as hell and only covers 1 state. I never all states have no standards. I said many have poor regulations, poor standards for homeschooling. They do.
And I wasn't trying to contradict your source either.

Quote:
Regardless, the guy wasn't some leftwinger. He supports private school vouchers and home schooling, jut regulated home schooling. So your attempt to ad hominem him, thus discrediting what he says, fails anyway.
I discredit the school simply for being leftist - just as I would discredit your link if it had been from Patrick Henry College, a college created mainly for kids that had been homeschooled (I think Patrick Henry would have a fit if he knew his name was being sullied by being applied to such a school).
__________________
A panda walks into a cafe. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and fires two shots in the air.

"Why?" asks the confused waiter, as the panda makes toward the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder.

"I'm a panda," he says at the door. "Look it up."

The waiter turns to the relevant entry and, sure enough, finds an explanation.

"Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves."

Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 03:29 PM
leviathon435's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 147
Location: Nottingham, England
Age: 17
Posts: 7,118
Rep Power: 8
leviathon435 will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chan View Post
Oh, so it's okay for your damned government indoctrination centers to brainwash people but it's wrong for parents - WHO ARE THE ONLY ONES RESPONSIBLE FOR EDUCATING THEIR CHILDREN - to do so?

There not your kids: keep your damned hands off!

Of course, it's clear that you have animus toward evangelical Christians based on your comments. Therefore, nothing you say is valid. What you SHOULD have gotten from Jesus Camp is the danger posed by those Christians who are following after dominion theology and/or Christian Reconstructionism.
This reminds me of a classic Humphery (from Yes Minister) quote: "parents are the worst people in the world to raise children, they've got no qualifications to do it!" But there is some sense to what he says, we wouldn't expect parents to perform surgery on their children, or to cure them of a serious illness, we'd leave it to the professionals. And so the same should be true for teaching, no child should be taught by anyone other than a qualified teacher.
__________________
Trust me, I'm a socialist!

There's power in a factory,power in the land, power in the hand of the worker. But it all amounts to nothing if together we don't stand, there is power in a union.
The union forever defending our rights, down with the blackleg, workers unite. To our brothers and our sisters in many far off lands, there is power in a union.
Money speaks for money, the devil for his own. - Billy Bragg
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 06-18-2008, 03:38 PM
Donkey Jote's Avatar
Sinner
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 205
Location: Ohio
Age: 19
Posts: 2,892
Rep Power: 3
Donkey Jote will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leviathon435 View Post
This reminds me of a classic Humphery (from Yes Minister) quote: "parents are the worst people in the world to raise children, they've got no qualifications to do it!" But there is some sense to what he says, we wouldn't expect parents to perform surgery on their children, or to cure them of a serious illness, we'd leave it to the professionals. And so the same should be true for teaching, no child should be taught by anyone other than a qualified teacher.
I'm arrogant enough to let my posts stand as a testament to how wrong you are.
__________________
"Have you no decency, sir? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?"
-Joseph Welch
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On






   PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings    Top Political Sites  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 AM.
Political Fever 2007/2008
   Word Search   |   Family Friendly   |   AdSense Forum   |   Game Cheats   |   Coupon Codes   |   Spore Game   |   Xcode Forum   |   Political Forums   |   Internet Marketing   |   Social Networking    |   Sudoku   |   Mobile Marketing   |   Web Forms   |   Articles & News   |   Loans & Credit Repair   |   Online Coupon Codes   |   Loans   |   Sudoku Puzzles   |   Map Games   |   Spore Screenshots