Quote:
|
You approved of how I described Ohio's method... yet I know several families who teach evolution as a falsehood, and they "get away" with it just fine.
|
I approved relative to other states that have nothing. It's a lot more solid. Doesn't mean it's itself the good choice if given others. Mine is better.
Quote:
Ironically enough, I've used some of those science books. They are generally very good, and thorough. My mum and I laughed through the sections on evolution and geological history, but overall found them quite useful.
Your bias won't let you see that.
Is it unfortunate that some parents don't believe in evolution and want to impart that belief onto their children? Yes. Is it the job of the state to explicitely prohibit that? no.
|
So a book that says the Earth is 6,000 years old is actually generally very good? You must be joking. Seriously. That a book would even have that in there destroys is credibility, period. It's a disgrace texts like that are sold and that people will say "well, if you ignore the CORE of biology (evolution), everything else is good. Biology falls down without evolution. It's instrumental. Any biology book which denies biology is a faerietale without a moral.
You can explicitly prohibit them from doing anything unless you send people to their homes to watch them. You can only make it more difficult, tie up their time creating materials and work samples that are to be submitted, make them take standardized tests on the subject that go into depth (so they MUST teach enough of said subject), and force them to spend money on things to eat up funds that could go to something else.
Technically, they might still be able to sneak it in on the side a bit. IN this case, they also get a real competitor worldview instead of the fundie bubble home schooling right now allows. If they can't pass the qualifications, they shouldn't be teaching that subject and it would be mandated that they have a school approved biology instructor if they cannot find one.