|
Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site! |
|
||||||
| Religion and Politics Discuss how Religion has and does affect the world we live in. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
What a silly statement. BTW, the eye-witness accounts all differ and were delivered decades after the fact, relying completely on hearsay evidence. Any assistant prosecutor fresh out of a piddling law school could poke holes in that story. . . .
__________________
Censorship reflects society's lack of confidence in itself. It is a hallmark of an authoritarian regime. ~Potter Stewart Last edited by Robert Ingersoll : 03-22-2008 at 08:19 PM. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
big difference. Quote:
![]()
__________________
Paul ---------- CLERGYMAN, n. A man who undertakes the management of our spiritual affairs as a method of bettering his temporal ones. Ambrose Bierce ---------- |
|
||||
|
Quote:
The Southern Man considers your use of the term "silly" with respect his intellectual argument as condescending and therefore insulting, and hereby requests that you refrain from its further use, unless you wish to work your way out of an intelligent conversation. Eye witness accounts frequently differ in details. If they were exactly the same then that would be evidence of conspiracy. You have a valid point about the timeline in contemporary terms but when you delve further into the contextual history the delay in the written record makes perfect sense. The traditions of the Aramaic language dictate that the testimonies be accurately circulated orally. The Old Testament, including such mundane facts as census data, survived intact for generations in this way. It wasn’t until Greek scholars learned of Christ, sought out the apostles, became students of them and wrote down the testimony did the written Gospels come to be. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
As a scientist I look at my Christianity differently. I have no problem analyzing the substantiated facts and coming up with, to me anyway, the obvious conclusion that Christ was an historical figure, and important philosopher, as well as the Son of God. Chocolate, beer and women are all best when dark, complex and a wee bit bitter. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
If they were the written records of oral recounting of events that happened several generations before they would lose a great deal of value as testimony. But then this is a matter of faith and it doesn't matter to Christians about the evidence value of the Gospels, I would think it's the spirit of the Gospels that matter to believers. |
|
|||
|
Absolutely correct. Nothing is so suspicious as two witnesses with the same story.
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Nope, it's actually more than that. It is the reality in my son's school, and since the school is public then it is difficult to comlpain much about it. The traditional Easter celebration is still strong in this country. Here is how America feels about the importance of Easter: America's churches will be much fuller than usual this weekend as Christians celebrate Easter, one of the two times a year when church attendance in the United States is traditionally at its highest.Easter Season Finds a Religious, Largely Christian, Nation |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|