|
Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site! |
|
||||||
| Religion and Politics Discuss how Religion has and does affect the world we live in. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I know, “been there done that.” Lets do it again…
![]() The idea came from an environmental thread I posted in where I referred to a tree as a device or gift that regulates the earths oxygen produced by the oceans. Anyhoot, since the earths been turning she’s had an oxygen level of ~21%. We know that trees don’t release oxygen at a constant, yet you can go anywhere in the world and observe oxygen constant at ~21%. Personally I suspect land based plant life is responsible for the regulation thus a device having been designed. The thread isn’t about trees, but I’d like to discuss the certainty of how Darwinist believe things like, “how mother nature knew there were smells so she could design us a nose” and sh_t.
__________________
Only a liberal would know how hard it is to get a nicotine patch to stick to a monkey. |
|
||||
|
"Mother Nature" don't know nothin'. Trees are not made to regulate oxygen. Trees were not "made" for anything. They were the result of genetic selection and attrition resulting in an organism that uses sunlight and CO2 to create Glucose, which it then utilizes ("burns") to release energy and, in the process, oxygen and H2O.
The atmosphere is 21% O2 because that's the level where the factors of biological O2 production, biological O2 consumption, chemical recombination, and probably things that I don't understand reach a stable equilibrium. This happens to be just right for the animals living on the Earth's surface because those animals are evolved to use the oxygen present, which is 21%. We have a nose because some distant ancestor of mankind at the cellular level had a set of proteins designed to detect certain chemicals and other proteins as a survival instinct. As life evolved, a similar concept formed for multicellular organisms. Being able to detect changes in what chemicals are present in the air is a natural survival trait. Also, since the cavity where air is pumped into the lungs is naturally exposed to great quantities of air, it was the natural location for a chemical sensing organ. Hence, a nose. The reason Intelligent Design believers don't "get" evolutionary theory is because they assume right off the bat that something designed everything. Even when you state that your theory is based on there not being an intelligent designer, they continue to subconsciously assume one (hence the "mother nature" comment).
__________________
An' it harm none, do as ye' will. ![]() Never argue with an idiot. He'll just drag you down to his level of intelligence and beat you with experience. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
In short, @10,000 feet the oxygen quantity is 50% that of sea level but still consists of 21% concentration. It’s pretty much the only constant occurring in nature as much as it being the only thing needing to be constant. If oxygen were random and we evolved from goo, are lungs would not be what we have today.
__________________
Only a liberal would know how hard it is to get a nicotine patch to stick to a monkey. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
In fact, though, oxygen concentration in the air varies minutely due to conflicting air masses; not by huge amounts, never more than about 1% and rarely that, but it does vary. And as you go higher in elevation, oxygen concentration does go down. In fact, once you get out of the troposphere, oxygen levels start to decline rapidly; by the time you reach the upper thermosphere, the main constituents of the atmosphere are hydrogen and helium with small amounts of nitrogen and other gases, including monatomic oxygen and ozone, which is formed by solar radiation knocking off electrons from O2 molecules, causing unstable ozone and monatomic oxygen to form. And if oxygen did, by some phenomenon, vary more than it does (by more than 5-10%) then our lungs would be different, through natural selection preferring those with lungs that could handle the wild changes in atmospheric composition without ill effects.
__________________
An' it harm none, do as ye' will. ![]() Never argue with an idiot. He'll just drag you down to his level of intelligence and beat you with experience. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|