Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site!

Go Back   Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums > Political Parties Discussion > Political Parties and Ideologies

Political Parties and Ideologies Discuss all political parties and Ideologies here. Everyone is welcome to share their political beliefs here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2008, 01:36 AM
ViolaLee's Avatar
Let's go Obama!
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Userid: 288
Location: NorCal
Posts: 3,309
Rep Power: 4
ViolaLee is on a distinguished road
Default A question for Libertarians

Do you think it's OK for a toxic waste company to buy the property next door and dump their toxic waste right next to where you live?
__________________
Obamanos!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2008, 01:43 AM
Principled Observer
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Userid: 460
Location: Peoples Republic of Ohio (Toledo)
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 1
Osborn F. Enready is on a distinguished road
Default

That question would be dependent on context.

Did I know the zoning for the land before hand?
Did I know the potential for this before hand?

Also, dumping toxic waste is criminal action that affects land beyond the property line, by seeping into water systems. This would be criminal negligence regarding the rights of other property owners.

IF it was handled safely, and rights were respected, and I knew about it before hand, sure, fine with me.
__________________
"If in the opinion of the people the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates, but let there be no change by usurpation; for though this in one instance may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed." George Washington, Farewell Address, September 17, 1796.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2008, 01:51 AM
ViolaLee's Avatar
Let's go Obama!
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Userid: 288
Location: NorCal
Posts: 3,309
Rep Power: 4
ViolaLee is on a distinguished road
Default

Would there be zoning at all if Libertarians had their way? Aren't you against all regulations?
__________________
Obamanos!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2008, 01:59 AM
Principled Observer
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Userid: 460
Location: Peoples Republic of Ohio (Toledo)
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 1
Osborn F. Enready is on a distinguished road
Default

Libertarians are NOT against all regulations.

This started as a Libertarian government, limited to sensible regulation.

The just function of the US government is to observe and protect individual rights in all areas of law, and to respect the limitations of the Constitution and those implied by the enumeration of individual rights, when reviewing and creating legislation created and put forth through constitutionally prescribed means.

Libertarians are for LIMITED GOVERNMENT.
The Government was designed as a CONSTITUTIONALLY LIMITED, democratic representative republic.

Its no coincidence.
__________________
"If in the opinion of the people the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates, but let there be no change by usurpation; for though this in one instance may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed." George Washington, Farewell Address, September 17, 1796.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2008, 02:02 AM
ViolaLee's Avatar
Let's go Obama!
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Userid: 288
Location: NorCal
Posts: 3,309
Rep Power: 4
ViolaLee is on a distinguished road
Default

Libertarians are for destroying the department of education too, right?
__________________
Obamanos!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2008, 07:17 AM
Phædrus's Avatar
Sarcasm on the rocks.
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 152
Location: Midland, TX
Posts: 2,375
Rep Power: 3
Phædrus is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ViolaLee View Post
Libertarians are for destroying the department of education too, right?
Well, I'm for phasing it out over the next ten to twenty years and reducing it to a regulatory role, just setting requirements for getting a diploma and checking to make sure that private schools meet regulations. Also, public primary school for free or cheap.

As for the dumping waste, it all depends on the type of waste, where it's being dumped, how long it will be around, and if it will spread to neighboring properties. Also, It'd be more okay if it were a person, less so if it were a corporation.
__________________
An' it harm none, do as ye' will.


Never argue with an idiot. He'll just drag you down to his level of intelligence and beat you with experience.

Last edited by Phædrus : 03-11-2008 at 07:23 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2008, 08:33 AM
Lumara's Avatar
Y'all be good now!
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 26
Location: A holler in Tennessee
Posts: 3,996
Rep Power: 10
Lumara will become famous soon enough
Default

I'm against the dumping of toxic waste because it pollutes the environment. Furthermore, I'm also opposed the CREATION of toxic waste and believe that nontoxic alternatives should be used.
__________________
"Feminism has fought no wars.
It has killed no opponents.
It has set up no concentration camps,
starved no enemies, practiced no cruelties.
Its battles have been for education, for the vote,
for better working conditions ...
for safety on the streets, for child care,
for rape crisis clinics, women's refuges, reforms in the laws.
If someone says, "Oh, I'm not a feminist!", I ask,
"Why? What's your problem?" - Dale Spender

_____________________________
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2008, 11:15 AM
xjoe3x's Avatar
Serae dubbs thee poo bear
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 206
Age: 20
Posts: 6,072
Rep Power: 7
xjoe3x will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ViolaLee View Post
Do you think it's OK for a toxic waste company to buy the property next door and dump their toxic waste right next to where you live?
No, and I do not know any Libertarian that would if that waste would effect the others person or property.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2008, 11:16 AM
xjoe3x's Avatar
Serae dubbs thee poo bear
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 206
Age: 20
Posts: 6,072
Rep Power: 7
xjoe3x will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phædrus View Post
Well, I'm for phasing it out over the next ten to twenty years and reducing it to a regulatory role, just setting requirements for getting a diploma and checking to make sure that private schools meet regulations. Also, public primary school for free or cheap.

As for the dumping waste, it all depends on the type of waste, where it's being dumped, how long it will be around, and if it will spread to neighboring properties. Also, It'd be more okay if it were a person, less so if it were a corporation.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2008, 11:18 AM
ViolaLee's Avatar
Let's go Obama!
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Userid: 288
Location: NorCal
Posts: 3,309
Rep Power: 4
ViolaLee is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phædrus View Post
Well, I'm for phasing it out over the next ten to twenty years and reducing it to a regulatory role, just setting requirements for getting a diploma and checking to make sure that private schools meet regulations. Also, public primary school for free or cheap.

As for the dumping waste, it all depends on the type of waste, where it's being dumped, how long it will be around, and if it will spread to neighboring properties. Also, It'd be more okay if it were a person, less so if it were a corporation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lumara View Post
I'm against the dumping of toxic waste because it pollutes the environment. Furthermore, I'm also opposed the CREATION of toxic waste and believe that nontoxic alternatives should be used.
Quote:
Originally Posted by xjoe3x View Post
No, and I do not know any Libertarian that would if that waste would effect the others person or property.
These aren't libertarian ideals. Libertarians are against government regulations. All of these answers are for government regulations. These are liberal ideals. Protecting the people through laws and regulations.

Phædrus - school is free now. If the dept of education is disbanded, only the kids who's parents have money will be able to afford to go to school.
__________________
Obamanos!

Last edited by ViolaLee : 03-11-2008 at 11:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On






   PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings    Top Political Sites  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:17 AM.
Political Fever 2007/2008
   Word Search   |   Family Friendly   |   AdSense Forum   |   Game Cheats   |   Coupon Codes   |   Spore Game   |   Xcode Forum   |   Political Forums   |   Internet Marketing   |   Social Networking    |   Sudoku   |   Mobile Marketing   |   Web Forms   |   Articles & News   |   Loans & Credit Repair   |   Online Coupon Codes   |   Loans   |   Sudoku Puzzles   |   Map Games   |   Spore Screenshots