|
Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site! |
|
||||||
| International Politics Discuss international politics here. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
When people look back at this US presidential election, it is unlikely they will be talking about the great autumnal debates of 2008.By general consent, they have been largely devoid of drama and - until the last contest, at least - devoid of much in the way of debate.The formats, which were agreed by the campaigns, did not exactly help.In the first two encounters there was little interaction, few follow-up questions and plenty of opportunities for the candidates to avoid giving direct answers.And then there is the fact that three of the four debaters were senators; members of a chamber, where speaking for hours on end - or filibustering, as it is known - is a prized political tool.
--------------------------------- Ashleejames Guaranteed ROI |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|