|
Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site! |
|
||||||
| International Politics Discuss international politics here. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Gay Rights Hero Murdered in Iraq
by RS Davis The Freedom Files ![]() Hello Freedomphiles! Sad news this morning. Twenty-seven year old Iraqi gay activist Bashar was assassinated yesterday. While sitting in a barber shop, gunmen busted in and riddled the young hero with bullets. Bashar led Iraqi LGBT, a safe house for oppressed gays on the run from psycho fanatic militias. He housed about 40 people at a time, and was responsible for saving the lives of dozens of people. Alli HIli - also of Iraqi LGBT - commented: "Violence against gays has intensified sharply since late 2005, when Iraq's leading Shiite Muslim cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, issued a fatwa, or religious decree, which declared that gays and lesbians should be 'killed in the worst, most severe way possible. "Since then, LGBT people have been specifically targeted by the Madhi Army, the militia of fundamentalist Shia cleric, Muqtada al-Sadr, as well as by the Badr organisation and other Shia death squads." Human rights activist Scott Portman said: "homosexuality is sometimes interpreted by people in Iraq as being a Western import. So they can sometimes be targeted by insurgent groups or militias in part because of animosity toward the West..." Animosity toward the West? Okay, f-ck it. I'm going to say it. Most of the Middle East is a backward sh-thole, where women are treated as chattel and hunting homosexuals is a sport. The term human rights is rarely uttered there, except maybe as a punchline to a joke. What the Hell happened over there? When the Persians and Arabs ruled the world, they were at the forefront of science, philosophy, and technology. They've somehow devolved back to the seventh century, mired themselves in fanatical anarchronistic intolerance and hatred. And this in Bush's grand experiment in exporting democracy. |
|
||||
|
Sorry, "gay rights" and "heroes" is an oxymoron.
Why is it that nothing is said when a heterosexual is assaulted but the moment some pervert is assaulted, all of a sudden the victim is some sort of hero. Why the hell can't assault be assault, murder be murder, vandalism be vandalism, etc. REGARDLESS OF THE VICTIM'S PERSONAL PROCLIVITIES!?!?!?!?!? And why the hell don't governments equally and vigorously enforce the laws against assault, murder, vandalism, etc.?
__________________
A panda walks into a cafe. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and fires two shots in the air. "Why?" asks the confused waiter, as the panda makes toward the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder. "I'm a panda," he says at the door. "Look it up." The waiter turns to the relevant entry and, sure enough, finds an explanation. "Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves." |
|
||||
|
Don't you mean 'some do....and they are just stupid?'
__________________
The law perverted! And the police powers of the state perverted along with it! The law, I say, not only turned from its proper purpose but made to follow an entirely contrary purpose! The law become the weapon of every kind of greed! Instead of checking crime, the law itself guilty of the evils it is supposed to punish! - Frederick Bastiat |
|
||||
|
Because in some societies, you 'owe' society your servitude, including their idea of morality. Many would like to bring that anti-liberty paradigm here and mask it as progressive / neoconservitism....whichever brand of despotism you prefer.
__________________
The law perverted! And the police powers of the state perverted along with it! The law, I say, not only turned from its proper purpose but made to follow an entirely contrary purpose! The law become the weapon of every kind of greed! Instead of checking crime, the law itself guilty of the evils it is supposed to punish! - Frederick Bastiat |
|
||||
|
Quote:
This is a man who risked his life daily to protect people who were being hunted down by militias simply because they were gay. This IS about gay rights - they weren't hunting down redheads. - R |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Besides, it's really perverted to elevate dead homos to the level of hero just for being dead homos when there are breeder women who get killed in the process of being raped but they're not elevated to the level of hero.
__________________
A panda walks into a cafe. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and fires two shots in the air. "Why?" asks the confused waiter, as the panda makes toward the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder. "I'm a panda," he says at the door. "Look it up." The waiter turns to the relevant entry and, sure enough, finds an explanation. "Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves." |
|
||||
|
Why is being gay perverted? The key is that people are being targeted simply because one group has an irrational dislike of them, as you seem to do by your callous reference to them as perverted homos.
This is the ultimate hypocrisy. The comedy writes itself. Freedom-fighter RAWR LIBERTY chan is prejudiced against gay people and thinks civil liberties advocates don't deserve mention when killed...for fighting for civil liberties. Chan is literally a parody of his own beliefs. Archie bunker really is a fitting avatar. You can guarantee he'd be on it like a fly on sht if it said "libertarian killed for promoting libertarianism. Then it would be an outrage." Only in Chan's mind can someone who is assassinated for advocating liberty not be significant.
__________________
Last edited by Technocratic_Utilitarian : 09-26-2008 at 02:59 PM. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|