|
Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site! |
|
||||||
| International Politics Discuss international politics here. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Yes, but not to that extent, everyone has a different idea of what they feel is "torture" and everyone thinks that torture (their definition of it) should not be allowed. It's just that defining thing that gets us.
I'm more lax on what I feel is torture and what isn't.
__________________
Set your destination with your heart, get there with your mind. "The wisest men follow their own direction." - Euripides |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Regardless of this particular kid's circumstances, our bizarre run with Gitmo and Abu Ghraib (anyone remember that?) should force us to re-evaluate what the hell we're doing. We don't seem to grasp that the technicalities of it aren't as important as the perceptions of it. We live in a 24/7 news cycle world, now. You can't hide this stuff anymore, and people are going to judge it, and us, by what they see. That picture of the hooded guy hooked up to batteries has become iconic, and I, for one am bothered that THAT is how we are being viewed. Keeping people in Gitmo for years on end without trial may be technically permissible, but it's pretty contrary to what we present ourselves as. Aren't we basically trying to convince "hearts and minds" that American Democracy is superior? If we treat these untried guys like any other country would, then what's the point? Get them to trial, and the State hasthe burden of proof. That should be a given, and it chills me that this is even an issue. The waterboarding thing simply shouldn't even BE a debate. Maybe I am being overly sensitive, but I expect and demand America conducts itself with honor and goes even beyond the Geneva Codes. Obviously, I am not saying give captured insurgents tea and cupcakes, but I think we can do much better than lowering ourselves to waterboarding and other methods of extraction.
__________________
"All those in favor of referring a study of leadership feasibility to the political viability subcommittee to consider forming a task group, signify by saying aye!" -- Congress |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
A panda walks into a cafe. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and fires two shots in the air. "Why?" asks the confused waiter, as the panda makes toward the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder. "I'm a panda," he says at the door. "Look it up." The waiter turns to the relevant entry and, sure enough, finds an explanation. "Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves." |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|