Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site!

Go Back   Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums > Political Central > International Politics

International Politics Discuss international politics here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-08-2008, 10:48 PM
Newest Mod
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 103
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,009
Rep Power: 4
pjohns will become famous soon enough
Default Iraq confronts Iran over weapons smuggling

The Iraqi government is now in possession of firm evidence that Iran is arming its Shiite proxies in Iraq. And Iraq is not soft-peddling the evidence, either. To the contrary, it has confronted Tehran with the evidence. As an article in PajamasMedia.com puts it, Iraq is conveying the following message to officials in Tehran:

"We know and you know that you’re providing these weapons and we can’t remain silent anymore. At the same time neither of us is going anywhere anytime soon, so we must learn to coexist. You don’t want us to be your enemies and we can’t afford to make you ours at the moment, so knock it off and let’s not show the world the dirty laundry."

It will be most instructive to see how Iran reacts.

Here is the complete article: Pajamas Media Iranian-Made Rocket Discovered Near Basra Alarms Iraqis
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 08:33 AM
Congressman
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Userid: 258
Posts: 339
Rep Power: 3
Recusant is on a distinguished road
Default

Lovely. Anyone recall the Iraq/Iran war of the 80s?

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-09-2008, 05:41 PM
Newest Mod
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 103
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,009
Rep Power: 4
pjohns will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Recusant View Post
Lovely. Anyone recall the Iraq/Iran war of the 80s?

Are you suggesting that Iraq (or, for that matter, the US) should adopt a head-in-the-sand approach?

Surely, no rational person could relish the prospect of conflict. But conflict avoidance should not be any nation's highest priority either. And it appears to me that the mullahs in Tehran are simply itching for a conflict. I can see no good reason why they should be issued a pass.

Besides, the Iraqi leaders' message to iran, as paraphrased by the author of the article I quoted--"[W]e must learn to coexist. You don’t want us to be your enemies and we can’t afford to make you ours at the moment"--hardly sounds like sabre-rattling.

Last edited by pjohns : 05-09-2008 at 05:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2008, 01:34 AM
Congressman
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Userid: 258
Posts: 339
Rep Power: 3
Recusant is on a distinguished road
Default

So let me get this straight. America, who's invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq is illegal - complains that Iran wants to interveine in their dirty laundry. The Iraqi government is more worried about Blackwater than it is about Iran.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2008, 02:16 PM
Newest Mod
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 103
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,009
Rep Power: 4
pjohns will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Recusant View Post
So let me get this straight. America, who's invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq is illegal - complains that Iran wants to interveine in their dirty laundry. The Iraqi government is more worried about Blackwater than it is about Iran.

Your gratuitous observation that America's "invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq is illegal" is predicated upon a hugely faulty assumption: i.e. that we all agree to genuflect to some transnational body (such as the UN), and refrain from whatever conflict it does not place its imprimatur upon. But many of us believe instead in the concept of national sovereignty--precisely as it was understood by Americans in 1908, or even 1808--which should never be compromised by some transnational body.

In short, there is nothing "illegal" about the Iraq War under American law--which is all that really counts with me.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On






     Top Political Sites  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.
Political Fever 2007/2008
   Word Search   |   Family Friendly   |   AdSense Forum   |   Game Cheats   |   Coupon Codes   |   Spore Game   |   Xcode Forum   |   Political Forums   |   Internet Marketing   |   Social Networking    |   Sudoku   |   Mobile Marketing   |   Web Forms   |   Articles & News   |   Loans & Credit Repair   |   Online Coupon Codes   |   Loans   |   Sudoku Puzzles   |   Map Games   |   Spore Screenshots   |   Acai Berry