Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site!

Go Back   Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums > Political Issues > History

History Discuss all history here!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 12-30-2007, 07:26 PM
picassoscat's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 52
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 197
Rep Power: 1
picassoscat is on a distinguished road
Default

The laser reflector has been used for years. I believe we have an astronomer on site. perhaps he could shed further light on this. But, I believe we went. Just am curious as to ehy we did not pursue to moon further and jumped to Mars exploration when there are so many mineral potentials on the moon.


Laser Ranging Retro-reflector Experiment

"The reflected laser beam is observed with the telescope, providing a measurement of the round-trip distance between Earth and the Moon. Laser beams are used because they remain tightly focused for large distances " -excerpt
__________________
Quote:
"A little known fact is that all of Picassos art was actually executed by his cat" - anonymous historian .

www.westernusawx.com
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 12-30-2007, 07:33 PM
Jesus H. Lincoln's Avatar
Resident Scientist
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 130
Location: Bloomington & Shelbyville, Indiana
Posts: 1,127
Rep Power: 2
Jesus H. Lincoln is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by picassoscat View Post
The laser reflector has been used for years. I believe we have an astronomer on site. perhaps he could shed further light on this.
It works similarly to sonar. We shoot a laser beam at a nearby object (by which I mean inside the solar system) with a frequency that's not commonly generated by natural processes to help cut down interference, and measure how long it takes for it to bounce back. Since all lasers are light and move at the speed of light in a vacuum which is an exact value (299,792,458 meters per second), we multiply this value by the number of seconds it took for the beam to return, and then divide by two since this time would be roundtrip. This is extremely accurate.

Interesting factoid: the reason the speed of light in a vacuum is an exact value is because the meter and, consequently, the foot, yard, and mile are defined by it. One meter is 1/299,792,458 the distance a light beam goes in one second. If the speed of light were measured more accurately and the outcome different from 299,792,458, the length of the meter would actually adjust to compensate and keep the value exactly at this number, as opposed to the number changing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by picassoscat View Post
But, I believe we went. Just am curious as to ehy we did not pursue to moon further and jumped to Mars exploration when there are so many mineral potentials on the moon.
We stopped working on it in the 70's and NASA's funding got severely cut. The Cold War spawned the Space Race, but it killed it, too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by picassoscat View Post
Laser Ranging Retro-reflector Experiment

"The reflected laser beam is observed with the telescope, providing a measurement of the round-trip distance between Earth and the Moon. Laser beams are used because they remain tightly focused for large distances " -excerpt
Exactly. Light beams normally fan out, but lasers stay focused. Also, light is normally heterogeneous, meaning it's composed of many different wavelengths of radiation. In lasers, all the photons are identical--the whole beam is one wavelength, so it's far more coherent.
__________________
01100001 01101000 00100000 01101011 01101001 01101100 01101100 01100101 01100100 00100000 01100001 00100000 01101101 01100001 01101110 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01110100 01100101 01111000 01110101 01110011 00111111

Last edited by Jesus H. Lincoln : 12-30-2007 at 07:36 PM. Reason: Added some info
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 12-30-2007, 08:45 PM
Phædrus's Avatar
Sarcasm on the rocks.
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 152
Location: Midland, TX
Posts: 2,375
Rep Power: 3
Phædrus is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by picassoscat View Post
The laser reflector has been used for years. I believe we have an astronomer on site. perhaps he could shed further light on this. But, I believe we went. Just am curious as to ehy we did not pursue to moon further and jumped to Mars exploration when there are so many mineral potentials on the moon.
Because Richard Nixon and the NASA big shots decided that it was more important to get "cheap" Earth to orbit capability, so they concentrated on the Shuttle. They even tried to burn the Saturn V's blueprints, so the Shuttle wouldn't have any competition. The Shuttle is perhaps one of the worst things that could have happened to the space program without it getting shut down.
__________________
An' it harm none, do as ye' will.


Never argue with an idiot. He'll just drag you down to his level of intelligence and beat you with experience.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 12-30-2007, 11:42 PM
Zephyr's Avatar
Visionary
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 58
Location: Wouldn't you like to know.
Age: 16
Posts: 3,278
Rep Power: 4
Zephyr has a spectacular aura about
Default

The laser reflector is similar to RADAR, or SONAR, or whatever. Lasers are in the visible spectrum and, as has been said, remain focused for long distances.
__________________
When's the last time you had happy days?
Blazin' up your herb to escape the maze.

~Dove, De La Soul, Itsoweezee


Thirty-three sayin nothin, second thirty-three just frontin', third thirty-three straight bluffin, Ice Tea sayin do somethin! Tupac sayin do somethin! NWA says do somethin! Zulu Nation sayin' c'mon, do somethin! Visionaries sayin do somethin!
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 12-30-2007, 11:44 PM
Phædrus's Avatar
Sarcasm on the rocks.
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 152
Location: Midland, TX
Posts: 2,375
Rep Power: 3
Phædrus is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zephyr View Post
The laser reflector is similar to RADAR, or SONAR, or whatever. Lasers are in the visible spectrum and, as has been said, remain focused for long distances.
Meaning up to millions of miles with astronomy grade ones. The photons are traveling nearly parallel - close enough to parallel for government work, at least, which ain't sayin' much.
__________________
An' it harm none, do as ye' will.


Never argue with an idiot. He'll just drag you down to his level of intelligence and beat you with experience.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 12-30-2007, 11:53 PM
Zephyr's Avatar
Visionary
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 58
Location: Wouldn't you like to know.
Age: 16
Posts: 3,278
Rep Power: 4
Zephyr has a spectacular aura about
Default

They're parallel enough for anything involving parallel photons!
__________________
When's the last time you had happy days?
Blazin' up your herb to escape the maze.

~Dove, De La Soul, Itsoweezee


Thirty-three sayin nothin, second thirty-three just frontin', third thirty-three straight bluffin, Ice Tea sayin do somethin! Tupac sayin do somethin! NWA says do somethin! Zulu Nation sayin' c'mon, do somethin! Visionaries sayin do somethin!
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2008, 08:25 PM
Congressman
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Userid: 228
Posts: 228
Rep Power: 1
Philadelphia is on a distinguished road
Default

With so much debate about whether there has been a Man on he moon let's agree it'll be a real achievement to get a Gran on the moon !!

But before that small step for Gran how about doing something really easy - focusing on the lunar surface with the most powerful telescopes. Surely that can settle it. Right ? I mean, those lunar rovers etc ? Didn't Hubble take pictures of objects hundreds of millions of miles away ? So what's the deal here ? How about some nice pictures of Apollo stuff on the lunar surface ?

Not much to ask is it ?
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2008, 10:39 PM
Jesus H. Lincoln's Avatar
Resident Scientist
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 130
Location: Bloomington & Shelbyville, Indiana
Posts: 1,127
Rep Power: 2
Jesus H. Lincoln is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philadelphia View Post
With so much debate about whether there has been a Man on he moon let's agree it'll be a real achievement to get a Gran on the moon !!

But before that small step for Gran how about doing something really easy - focusing on the lunar surface with the most powerful telescopes. Surely that can settle it. Right ? I mean, those lunar rovers etc ? Didn't Hubble take pictures of objects hundreds of millions of miles away ? So what's the deal here ? How about some nice pictures of Apollo stuff on the lunar surface ?

Not much to ask is it ?
Hubble's got good resolution, but not that good. When photographing the moon, the highest resolution that Hubble can achieve is about 60 meters. The largest piece of Apollo equipment left is about 9 meters wide, making it smaller than a single pixel in a Hubble image of the Moon.

However, this year NASA is scheduled to launch the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter which will orbit the Moon and be able to take about 0.5m resolution pictures. At this resolution, buildings and automobiles are easily visible on the surface of the Earth:



This picture has a resolution the same as the LROC, or the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera.

The Apollo site should be easily visible once images of it are taken by this craft.
__________________
01100001 01101000 00100000 01101011 01101001 01101100 01101100 01100101 01100100 00100000 01100001 00100000 01101101 01100001 01101110 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01110100 01100101 01111000 01110101 01110011 00111111
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2008, 11:34 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 1
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Age: 19
Posts: 2,102
Rep Power: 0
Dustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Are you able to see the flag on the moon with a simple telescope?
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 01-06-2008, 12:12 AM
Jesus H. Lincoln's Avatar
Resident Scientist
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 130
Location: Bloomington & Shelbyville, Indiana
Posts: 1,127
Rep Power: 2
Jesus H. Lincoln is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dustin View Post
Are you able to see the flag on the moon with a simple telescope?
The Moon's diameter is approximately 3500 km. The Moon is about 400,000 km from Earth on average, giving it an angular size of about 30 arcminutes in the sky as seen from Earth. There are 60 arcseconds per arcminute, so the Moon is about 1800 arcseconds across. 1800 arcseconds = 3500 km, 1 km = .51 arcseconds. An average flag is about a meter wide, let's say. So the flag will make up about 0.00015 arcseconds in angular size.

My personal telescope, with a 3.5"/88.9 mm aperture (0.0889 m), has a resolution of about 6.19e-6 radians, or 1.28 arcseconds. That means the smallest point of light distinguishable in my telescope (which is an average astronomical telescope) is around 8,500 times larger in angular size than the flag at the landing site. The lander, being maybe nine times larger in angular size, would still be about 950 times too small to make out with an average telescope.

To be able to make out the flag at all, you'd need a telescope with an aperture of 272 meters, or 894 feet. To make out the lander, you'd need a telescope with an aperture of around 99 feet. However, keep in mind that this is just to technically be able to make it out as a single pixel. To make them sizeable enough to know what you're looking at, you'd need probably 250 square pixels, so the aperture size would need to be another 50 times larger, making for a minimum of about a one-mile aperture. So the opening on your optical telescope would need to be one mile in diameter.
__________________
01100001 01101000 00100000 01101011 01101001 01101100 01101100 01100101 01100100 00100000 01100001 00100000 01101101 01100001 01101110 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01110100 01100101 01111000 01110101 01110011 00111111

Last edited by Jesus H. Lincoln : 01-06-2008 at 12:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On






   PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings    Top Political Sites  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16 PM.
Political Fever 2007/2008
   Word Search   |   Family Friendly   |   AdSense Forum   |   Game Cheats   |   Coupon Codes   |   Spore Game   |   Xcode Forum   |   Political Forums   |   Internet Marketing   |   Social Networking    |   Sudoku   |   Mobile Marketing   |   Web Forms   |   Articles & News   |   Loans & Credit Repair   |   Online Coupon Codes   |   Loans   |   Sudoku Puzzles   |   Map Games   |   Spore Screenshots