|
Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site! |
|
||||||
| History Discuss all history here! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
The laser reflector has been used for years. I believe we have an astronomer on site. perhaps he could shed further light on this. But, I believe we went. Just am curious as to ehy we did not pursue to moon further and jumped to Mars exploration when there are so many mineral potentials on the moon.
Laser Ranging Retro-reflector Experiment "The reflected laser beam is observed with the telescope, providing a measurement of the round-trip distance between Earth and the Moon. Laser beams are used because they remain tightly focused for large distances " -excerpt
__________________
Quote:
www.westernusawx.com |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Interesting factoid: the reason the speed of light in a vacuum is an exact value is because the meter and, consequently, the foot, yard, and mile are defined by it. One meter is 1/299,792,458 the distance a light beam goes in one second. If the speed of light were measured more accurately and the outcome different from 299,792,458, the length of the meter would actually adjust to compensate and keep the value exactly at this number, as opposed to the number changing. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
01100001 01101000 00100000 01101011 01101001 01101100 01101100 01100101 01100100 00100000 01100001 00100000 01101101 01100001 01101110 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01110100 01100101 01111000 01110101 01110011 00111111 Last edited by Jesus H. Lincoln : 12-30-2007 at 07:36 PM. Reason: Added some info |
|
||||
|
The laser reflector is similar to RADAR, or SONAR, or whatever. Lasers are in the visible spectrum and, as has been said, remain focused for long distances.
__________________
When's the last time you had happy days? Blazin' up your herb to escape the maze. ~Dove, De La Soul, Itsoweezee Thirty-three sayin nothin, second thirty-three just frontin', third thirty-three straight bluffin, Ice Tea sayin do somethin! Tupac sayin do somethin! NWA says do somethin! Zulu Nation sayin' c'mon, do somethin! Visionaries sayin do somethin! |
|
||||
|
Meaning up to millions of miles with astronomy grade ones. The photons are traveling nearly parallel - close enough to parallel for government work, at least, which ain't sayin' much.
__________________
An' it harm none, do as ye' will. ![]() Never argue with an idiot. He'll just drag you down to his level of intelligence and beat you with experience. |
|
||||
|
They're parallel enough for anything involving parallel photons!
![]()
__________________
When's the last time you had happy days? Blazin' up your herb to escape the maze. ~Dove, De La Soul, Itsoweezee Thirty-three sayin nothin, second thirty-three just frontin', third thirty-three straight bluffin, Ice Tea sayin do somethin! Tupac sayin do somethin! NWA says do somethin! Zulu Nation sayin' c'mon, do somethin! Visionaries sayin do somethin! |
|
|||
|
With so much debate about whether there has been a Man on he moon let's agree it'll be a real achievement to get a Gran on the moon !!
But before that small step for Gran how about doing something really easy - focusing on the lunar surface with the most powerful telescopes. Surely that can settle it. Right ? I mean, those lunar rovers etc ? Didn't Hubble take pictures of objects hundreds of millions of miles away ? So what's the deal here ? How about some nice pictures of Apollo stuff on the lunar surface ? Not much to ask is it ? |
|
||||
|
Quote:
However, this year NASA is scheduled to launch the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter which will orbit the Moon and be able to take about 0.5m resolution pictures. At this resolution, buildings and automobiles are easily visible on the surface of the Earth: ![]() This picture has a resolution the same as the LROC, or the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera. The Apollo site should be easily visible once images of it are taken by this craft.
__________________
01100001 01101000 00100000 01101011 01101001 01101100 01101100 01100101 01100100 00100000 01100001 00100000 01101101 01100001 01101110 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01110100 01100101 01111000 01110101 01110011 00111111 |
|
||||
|
Quote:
My personal telescope, with a 3.5"/88.9 mm aperture (0.0889 m), has a resolution of about 6.19e-6 radians, or 1.28 arcseconds. That means the smallest point of light distinguishable in my telescope (which is an average astronomical telescope) is around 8,500 times larger in angular size than the flag at the landing site. The lander, being maybe nine times larger in angular size, would still be about 950 times too small to make out with an average telescope. To be able to make out the flag at all, you'd need a telescope with an aperture of 272 meters, or 894 feet. To make out the lander, you'd need a telescope with an aperture of around 99 feet. However, keep in mind that this is just to technically be able to make it out as a single pixel. To make them sizeable enough to know what you're looking at, you'd need probably 250 square pixels, so the aperture size would need to be another 50 times larger, making for a minimum of about a one-mile aperture. So the opening on your optical telescope would need to be one mile in diameter.
__________________
01100001 01101000 00100000 01101011 01101001 01101100 01101100 01100101 01100100 00100000 01100001 00100000 01101101 01100001 01101110 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01110100 01100101 01111000 01110101 01110011 00111111 Last edited by Jesus H. Lincoln : 01-06-2008 at 12:14 AM. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|