You're a professional chemist?


Yes, which is clearly why the temperature rises and falls a few years after the CO2 concentrations do the same thing.

So, as a chemist, you really don't believe that CO2 is a greenhouse gas?

Forget it, I shouldn't have tried.

__________________
"Moreover, I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states...Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial "outside agitator" idea. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds."



~Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Carbon Dioxide has been postulated to be a greenhouse gas using mathematical equations. At concentrations of 50 - 100%, it probably has those properties. However it is in the atmosphere at 380 part per million. If it has those properties it is very weak AND other than the mathematical equations, I have found no hard laboratory data that actually demonstrates that it has those properties actually exist.

As a Professional chemist, I am from Missouri... show me the proof.

Again, the data correlating temperature and carbon dioxide do not show cause and effect.. Carbon dioxide increases do not occur prior to the temperature changes... it does not show that.

Just to be clear, is it just carbon dioxide that you think is not a greenhouse gas? Or do you reject their existence entirely?

__________________
"Moreover, I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states...Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial "outside agitator" idea. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds."



~Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Global Warming deniers always assert no one provides "data' for global warming. In reality, they just ignore what they don't want to hear and then claim no one provides the data.

Pouring drain-o down the pipes doesn't make you a chemist. And even if he were a chemist, his degree is virtually irrelevant to a critique of climatological theories. He's not even qualified.

If you are going to degree drop ,at least provide some evidence you really are a chemist.

1. University attended, year, class number.
2. Proof of graduation (certificate of graduation scanned)

Until then, no one cares who you say you are. I can say I am the Dali Llama on the Internet.




Note* Truth is wrong. He says the data do not show an increase in CO2 before temperature. That's false. That's only in the beginning. Not later. The The fact that the original warming people had CO2 increases AFTER temperature has explanations for it. There are extraneous factors that mitigated warming and secondly, a feedback loop. He's assuming that because not ALL heating is caused by CO2, therefore, CO2 doesn't cause the heating. Later, when Co2 was introduced in larger quantities and mitigating factors are taken away, the Co2 does cause a net increase in heating. I provided several articles on this from RealClimate.org.

Of course, he ignored them. You know...actual climate scientists.

But then again, he's an "internet chemist." So that obviously means he can dismiss all data.

Also just to be clear, what chemistry activities are you paid to engage in?

__________________
"Moreover, I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states...Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial "outside agitator" idea. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds."



~Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

ice cores anyone?

__________________
No party holds the privilege of dictating to me how I shall vote. If loyalty to party is a form of patriotism, I am no patriot. If there is any valuable difference between a monarchist and an American, it lies in the theory that the American can decide for himself what is patriotic and what isn't. I claim that difference. I am the only person in the sixty millions that is privileged to dictate my patriotism.
- Mark Twain, a Biography

The cooling trend illustrates how fast the world is warming. These people are out of their damn minds.

My Way News - Obama left with little time to curb global warming

__________________
Carolina Politics Online

Sam

A record breaking -29 in Montana today.

__________________
Carolina Politics Online

Sam

In other news, Sam in the South continues to blatantly disregard the scientific authorities because he's so goddamn intelligent that they must be wrong, and he right.

__________________
"Moreover, I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states...Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial "outside agitator" idea. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds."



~Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.