Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site!

Go Back   Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums > Political Issues > Enviromental Issues

Enviromental Issues Discuss Environmental Issues here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008, 01:47 PM
TheStripey1's Avatar
Recovering republican
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Userid: 396
Location: California
Posts: 1,158
Rep Power: 2
TheStripey1 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Technocratic_Utilitarian View Post
Sam's been reading too much Michael Chriton.
I'm agreeing with Techno on something??



Quote:
Originally Posted by Oregon Elephant View Post
A ridiculous story about some schmuck saying this or that about it does not validate the entire theory. That is just a sad fallacy.
It invalidates it for Sam... and many of those who think like him... so for Sam and his cronies... it works...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chan View Post
The real fallacy is in assuming that climate change is a bad thing and that we absolutely must do something about it.

Talk to me about climate change when Al Gore and his cult followers are all living exactly the kind of green lifestyle they propose to force on everyone else!
Show me a link that states Nobel Prize Winner Al Gore is trying to force any changes on anyone.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oregon Elephant View Post
So because Al Gore is a hypocritic, that discredits everything else?
it does for Chan and his cronies...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chan View Post
It goes to credibility. Besides, it has not been proven that climate change is necessarily a bad thing or that there have not been periods of warming and cooling in the past. Why do we assume that just because we're arguably the dominant species on the planet that we should be exempt from having to adapt to changes in the environment instead of trying to force the environment to adapt to us?

So what if it has happened in the past? How many people died as a result of the famines created by the droughts? Or died in the flooding? Or were killed in wars fought over the loss of terrirtory and/or resources? How many cities were swallowed up by rising seas?

hmmm, chan? How many?
__________________
I cannot teach anybody anything, I can only make them think.
~~Socrates

My Pep Talk For Lefties and Lurkers
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008, 09:23 PM
Zephyr's Avatar
Endless Summer
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 58
Location: Wouldn't you like to know.
Age: 16
Posts: 3,105
Rep Power: 4
Zephyr will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
The real fallacy is in assuming that climate change is a bad thing and that we absolutely must do something about it.
Well, since civilization didn't exist the last time something like this happened, we have no idea whether or not it would be bad. I, and more importantly, practically every credible climatologist, believe that it will probably be bad.
__________________
Corporation, noun: an ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility.
~Ambrose Bierce

When I feed the poor, they call me a saint.
When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a Communist.

~Dom Helder Camara

Businessmen have generally an interest to deceive and even to oppress the public.

~Adam Smith
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2008, 04:12 AM
Technocratic_Utilitarian's Avatar
Defender of Reason
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 91
Location: New Jersey
Age: 23
Posts: 1,650
Rep Power: 2
Technocratic_Utilitarian is on a distinguished road
Default

The fact that there will be more intense storms, increasing desertification, destruction of farmland, loss of coastal settlements, disruption of coastal fishing...no. Of course that's not bad. Not bad at all. \

You're absolutely right. Global Warming isn't a bad thing. That is...if you like global catastrophe, starvation, and economic hardship, of course. Yea! Sounds awesome.





Edit: people also think that, if you attack Al Gore, you somehow negate the validity of global warming. That's silly. The validity of global warming is independent of anything Al Gore says or does. Moreover, it's moronic to say you won't change your behaviour or even listen to something because you dislike the actions of the people who recommend it. That's like saying you will ignore the fact that murder is wrong because a murderer admits he does it anyway.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2008, 04:02 PM
Skerlnik's Avatar
Occam's Autocrat
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Userid: 584
Location: Tucson
Age: 36
Posts: 1,130
Rep Power: 2
Skerlnik will become famous soon enough
Default

Aren't we always the ones that jump on people for not being savvy enough to see a potential disaster coming, and not taking care of situations easily at the first stages? We're always so smug, and say "Gee, ya didn't see that coming, Sparky?" Like when the last guy went out to cut down the last tree on Easter Island......

Global Warming is something that will likely become progressively more painful and difficult to fix as time goes by. Our resistance and denial of simple, relatively cost-effective changes now will look really stupid in twenty-five, fifty, years.

I have no idea if man-made GW is real or not. To me, that's not the point. It's all about taking responsibility for the future. Heck, even if this trend is simply a natural fluctuation, why not fight that, too? We certainly have the means to. Just because it's natural, doesn't mean it's a good thing, either. Our entire history of manking is a story of manipulating and conquering Mother Nature for our own comfort. Why not with this, too?
__________________
There is no sig. There never was a sig. The sig is a lie.

Last edited by Skerlnik : 07-19-2008 at 04:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2008, 09:42 AM
Chan's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 133
Location: Buffalo, New York, USA
Posts: 3,908
Rep Power: 4
Chan will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zephyr View Post
Well, since civilization didn't exist the last time something like this happened, we have no idea whether or not it would be bad. I, and more importantly, practically every credible climatologist, believe that it will probably be bad.
The fact that life adapted and survived is enough to suggest that it probably wasn't bad.

I don't give a rat's behind what "every credible climatologist" says! And what the hell makes them "credible" anyway - your agreement with what they say? I remember when these so-called "credible climatologists" were warning about a coming ice age.

It's all much ado about nothing.

Is it true that the overall global temperature rose a degree or two over the last 100 years? Yes. Does that mean we should all of a sudden just rip apart the very fabric of Western Civilization to conform to untested proposals from a bunch of insane environmentalists who are not themselves living the lifestyle they insist we all must live? No.

Talk to me when Al Gore and his cult all successfully live their lives according to what they expect from the rest of us - and that includes no fossil fuels, no meat, etc.
__________________
A panda walks into a cafe. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and fires two shots in the air.

"Why?" asks the confused waiter, as the panda makes toward the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder.

"I'm a panda," he says at the door. "Look it up."

The waiter turns to the relevant entry and, sure enough, finds an explanation.

"Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves."


Last edited by Chan : 07-21-2008 at 09:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2008, 09:55 AM
Chan's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 133
Location: Buffalo, New York, USA
Posts: 3,908
Rep Power: 4
Chan will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheStripey1 View Post
So what if it has happened in the past? How many people died as a result of the famines created by the droughts? Or died in the flooding? Or were killed in wars fought over the loss of terrirtory and/or resources? How many cities were swallowed up by rising seas?

hmmm, chan? How many?
Stop getting your panties in a knot, Stripey!

The fact that it happened in the past is at least circumstantial evidence that global warming is not man-made and that life has survived previous periods of warming and cooling that quite clearly happen in cycles. And even if humans are contributing to the current warming trend, so what? One or two degrees over the course of a hundred years is pretty much meaningless.

It doesn't matter how many people died in these little droughts that happen from time to time. You make it sound as if drought is something new that has never happened before. As for the flooding, well, if people are stupid enough to build their homes on a flood plain they deserve to die - and there's no proof that these were caused by global warming. As for cities swallowed up by rising seas, I have yet to hear of any.
__________________
A panda walks into a cafe. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and fires two shots in the air.

"Why?" asks the confused waiter, as the panda makes toward the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder.

"I'm a panda," he says at the door. "Look it up."

The waiter turns to the relevant entry and, sure enough, finds an explanation.

"Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves."

Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2008, 10:02 AM
Chan's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 133
Location: Buffalo, New York, USA
Posts: 3,908
Rep Power: 4
Chan will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skerlnik View Post
Aren't we always the ones that jump on people for not being savvy enough to see a potential disaster coming, and not taking care of situations easily at the first stages? We're always so smug, and say "Gee, ya didn't see that coming, Sparky?" Like when the last guy went out to cut down the last tree on Easter Island......
Trees can be re-planted. But, then again, you're assuming that having trees on Easter Island is preferable to not having trees on Easter Island.

Quote:
Global Warming is something that will likely become progressively more painful and difficult to fix as time goes by. Our resistance and denial of simple, relatively cost-effective changes now will look really stupid in twenty-five, fifty, years.
Well, you know something, there have been periods of warming and cooling throughout recorded history and we've survived just fine. We're human: we adapt, we overcome. Why do you people insist humans must conquer their environment instead of adapting to it?

Quote:
I have no idea if man-made GW is real or not. To me, that's not the point. It's all about taking responsibility for the future. Heck, even if this trend is simply a natural fluctuation, why not fight that, too? We certainly have the means to. Just because it's natural, doesn't mean it's a good thing, either. Our entire history of manking is a story of manipulating and conquering Mother Nature for our own comfort. Why not with this, too?
Actually, whether it's man-made or not is the entire point. The Al Gore Cult insists that humans are at fault by their use of fossil fuels, eating meat (which comes from animals that require significant natural resources to raise commercially), etc., and that we must eliminate our carbon footprints even while Al himself maintains his giant carbon footprint. Again, however, you assume that humans must fight and conquer the environment instead of adapt to it.
__________________
A panda walks into a cafe. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and fires two shots in the air.

"Why?" asks the confused waiter, as the panda makes toward the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder.

"I'm a panda," he says at the door. "Look it up."

The waiter turns to the relevant entry and, sure enough, finds an explanation.

"Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves."

Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 07-26-2008, 10:00 AM
Congressman
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Userid: 445
Location: South Carolina
Age: 31
Posts: 834
Rep Power: 1
SamInTheSouth is on a distinguished road
Default

Global Warming has apparently gotten so threatening that Alaska is facing it's coolest summer on record

Quote:
The coldest summer ever? You might be looking at it, weather folks say.

Right now the so-called summer of '08 is on pace to produce the fewest days ever recorded in which the temperature in Anchorage managed to reach 65 degrees.

That unhappy record was set in 1970, when we only made it to the 65-degree mark, which many Alaskans consider a nice temperature, 16 days out of 365.

This year, however -- with the summer more than half over -- there have been only seven 65-degree days so far. And that's with just a month of potential "balmy" days remaining and the forecast looking gloomy.

Anchorage Daily News
__________________
Carolina Politics Online

Sam
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 07-26-2008, 10:38 AM
Lumara's Avatar
Y'all be good now!
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 26
Location: A holler in Tennessee
Posts: 4,009
Rep Power: 10
Lumara will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chan View Post
As for the flooding, well, if people are stupid enough to build their homes on a flood plain they deserve to die
That's really harsh, Chan. I could go along with a statement to the effect that people who are stupid enough to build their homes on a flood plain should be prepared to pay the consequences and not be bailed out by the taxpayers, but I don't agree that they deserve to die. I find such a sentiment to be, well I can't even find the words - I guess over the top and cruel.
__________________
"Feminism has fought no wars.
It has killed no opponents.
It has set up no concentration camps,
starved no enemies, practiced no cruelties.
Its battles have been for education, for the vote,
for better working conditions ...
for safety on the streets, for child care,
for rape crisis clinics, women's refuges, reforms in the laws.
If someone says, "Oh, I'm not a feminist!", I ask,
"Why? What's your problem?" - Dale Spender

_____________________________
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 07-26-2008, 07:15 PM
Chan's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 133
Location: Buffalo, New York, USA
Posts: 3,908
Rep Power: 4
Chan will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lumara View Post
That's really harsh, Chan. I could go along with a statement to the effect that people who are stupid enough to build their homes on a flood plain should be prepared to pay the consequences and not be bailed out by the taxpayers, but I don't agree that they deserve to die. I find such a sentiment to be, well I can't even find the words - I guess over the top and cruel.
Is not death a possible consequence of building their homes on a flood plain? Do they not deserve to bear the consequences of their choices?
__________________
A panda walks into a cafe. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and fires two shots in the air.

"Why?" asks the confused waiter, as the panda makes toward the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder.

"I'm a panda," he says at the door. "Look it up."

The waiter turns to the relevant entry and, sure enough, finds an explanation.

"Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves."

Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On






   PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings    Top Political Sites  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56 AM.
Political Fever 2007/2008
   Word Search   |   Family Friendly   |   AdSense Forum   |   Game Cheats   |   Coupon Codes   |   Spore Game   |   Xcode Forum   |   Political Forums   |   Internet Marketing   |   Social Networking    |   Sudoku   |   Mobile Marketing   |   Web Forms   |   Articles & News   |   Loans & Credit Repair   |   Online Coupon Codes   |   Loans   |   Sudoku Puzzles   |   Map Games   |   Spore Screenshots