Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site!

Go Back   Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums > Political Issues > Enviromental Issues

Enviromental Issues Discuss Environmental Issues here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2008, 01:32 PM
Congressman
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Userid: 745
Posts: 2,585
Rep Power: 3
Truth for a Change is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zephyr View Post
Again, this just means you haven't looked for any of the data...
I have and find nothing which supports the hoax... only a Political agenda and closed mind numb robots, in lock step with the leftist agenda..

10 - 20 PPM carbon dioxide can do nothing. There is not even good evidence that carbon dioxide at 380 ppm can even have any effect on temperature...

and all of the temperature changes are within the variation that the earth has naturally.

It is all a hoax... just another attempt by the left to put their hand in the pockets of Americans and steal more of their money.
Reply With Quote
  #152 (permalink)  
Old 08-20-2008, 11:50 PM
Zephyr's Avatar
Obama's Socialist Goon
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 58
Location: Wouldn't you like to know.
Age: 17
Posts: 4,642
Rep Power: 7
Zephyr is a jewel in the roughZephyr is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
I have and find nothing which supports the hoax... only a Political agenda and closed mind numb robots, in lock step with the leftist agenda..

10 - 20 PPM carbon dioxide can do nothing. There is not even good evidence that carbon dioxide at 380 ppm can even have any effect on temperature...

and all of the temperature changes are within the variation that the earth has naturally.

It is all a hoax... just another attempt by the left to put their hand in the pockets of Americans and steal more of their money.
You haven't looked very hard, then.
__________________
"Moreover, I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states...Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial "outside agitator" idea. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds."



~Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Reply With Quote
  #153 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 04:21 AM
Chosen1's Avatar
President Elect
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Userid: 785
Location: Oaktown, USA
Posts: 1,043
Rep Power: 2
Chosen1 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Technocratic_Utilitarian View Post
You don't have the experience, education, or intelligence to claim there's not enough data to give an educated reason. So no, it's still not sound.

You are a layman. Your google-fu is hardly adequate to make such sweeping claims outside your field of expertise. It's highly arrogant to dismiss all the hard work of the world's top scientists based on your5 min internet research.
You think you know me well enough to make these claims? No, you don't. Trying to discredit my comments by making these wild assumptions about my "experience, education, or intelligence" shows that it is you that is being arrogant. If you can provide accurate information on the weather trends prior to the age of dinosaurs, then I may give what you say some credence. NOBODY has that information, it is only based on assumption. You don't have to be an expert to understand that.

I am sure you are not an expert on global warming either, nor is it your expertise, so don't pretend you are mister know it all. Maybe you should put less trust on what others feed you and relay more on common sense. Modern day scientist can only theorize the causes of global warming based on the data that they have access to. You can put your faith in what they say, but I prefer to look at the BIG picture (including the data that is available) and decide for myself. I take into account the theories concerning global warming, but I also take it with a grain of salt. I prefer to keep an open mind.

By the way, your "5 min internet research" comment is amusing. And your "google-fu" comment...that's funny
Reply With Quote
  #154 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 04:25 AM
Chosen1's Avatar
President Elect
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Userid: 785
Location: Oaktown, USA
Posts: 1,043
Rep Power: 2
Chosen1 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zephyr View Post
Dude, you have no idea what you're talking about.
Care to explain why you say this and what part of my comment it is that you don't agree with? It's easy to say that someone has "no idea" of what they are talking about, but can you back it up with some details? What is it about my comment that you disagree with?
Reply With Quote
  #155 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 05:15 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 91
Location: New Jersassistan
Age: 24
Posts: 2,645
Rep Power: 0
Technocratic_Utilitarian will become famous soon enough
Default

[qoute]Modern day scientist can only theorize the causes of global warming based on the data that they have access to[/quote]

No, really? What a profound observation, genius. And where did you get your climatology credentials? Holiday Inn Express? Again, you clearly haven't the knowledge or training to understand the issue, so you have no business attempting, feebly as you are, to contradict trained professionals.
Reply With Quote
  #156 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 05:19 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 91
Location: New Jersassistan
Age: 24
Posts: 2,645
Rep Power: 0
Technocratic_Utilitarian will become famous soon enough
Default

[qoute]Modern day scientist can only theorize the causes of global warming based on the data that they have access to[/quote]

No, really? What a profound observation, genius. And where did you get your climatology degree? Holiday Inn Express?

Quote:
I prefer to keep an open mind.
You shouldn't be so open that your brain falls out. You don't have the academic credentials or training to think for yourself or decide for yourself on complex scientific issues. Leave the science to the scientists and keep masturbating to xtube. That's more on your level.

I know that's what I do.
Reply With Quote
  #157 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 11:20 AM
Chosen1's Avatar
President Elect
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Userid: 785
Location: Oaktown, USA
Posts: 1,043
Rep Power: 2
Chosen1 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Technocratic_Utilitarian View Post
Quote:
Modern day scientist can only theorize the causes of global warming based on the data that they have access to
No, really? What a profound observation, genius. And where did you get your climatology degree? Holiday Inn Express?



You shouldn't be so open that your brain falls out. You don't have the academic credentials or training to think for yourself or decide for yourself on complex scientific issues. Leave the science to the scientists and keep masturbating to xtube. That's more on your level.

I know that's what I do.
Is this your way of dealing with others that don't agree with your ideas? Argumentum ad hominem ad nauseam is what you have shown so far. Typical.
Reply With Quote
  #158 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 11:28 AM
Congressman
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Userid: 745
Posts: 2,585
Rep Power: 3
Truth for a Change is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zephyr View Post
You haven't looked very hard, then.
So, does that mean that you have? if so, please provide the references?

I have searched all over for even information supporting the notion that CO2 is a greenhouse gas.. and all I can find are computer models and studies contaminated with other materials.

Therefore, I have found nothing to even suggest that 100% carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas.. let alone 10 -20 ppm.

That does not mean that there are data.. I just have not found it.
Reply With Quote
  #159 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 12:37 PM
Zephyr's Avatar
Obama's Socialist Goon
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 58
Location: Wouldn't you like to know.
Age: 17
Posts: 4,642
Rep Power: 7
Zephyr is a jewel in the roughZephyr is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Therefore, I have found nothing to even suggest that 100% carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas.. let alone 10 -20 ppm.

That does not mean that there are data.. I just have not found it.
If you have failed to realize that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, then you are just an idiot who is wasting everyone's time.

Try subscribing to a scientific journal or two.
__________________
"Moreover, I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states...Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial "outside agitator" idea. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds."



~Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Reply With Quote
  #160 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2008, 12:55 PM
Congressman
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Userid: 745
Posts: 2,585
Rep Power: 3
Truth for a Change is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zephyr View Post
If you have failed to realize that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, then you are just an idiot who is wasting everyone's time.

Try subscribing to a scientific journal or two.
Yes, I actually tried to find the data which demonstrates that CO2 is a greenhouse gas. I was such an idiot that I actually questioned the Democrat party and numbskull AL Bore.. and the so called 'consensus of scientists'...


and you know what? I did not find any studies which demonstrate it unequivocally. I found many who put data in to a computer program and obtained the answers that they wanted...

Obviously from your knee jerk response, you accepted it .. in lock step with the Democrat party agenda....and energy user aL bore...

I might ask that you re-consider who the idiot actually is?

Last edited by Truth for a Change : 08-21-2008 at 01:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On






     Top Political Sites  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:57 PM.
Political Fever 2007/2008
   Word Search   |   Family Friendly   |   AdSense Forum   |   Game Cheats   |   Coupon Codes   |   Spore Game   |   Xcode Forum   |   Political Forums   |   Internet Marketing   |   Social Networking    |   Sudoku   |   Mobile Marketing   |   Web Forms   |   Articles & News   |   Loans & Credit Repair   |   Online Coupon Codes   |   Loans   |   Sudoku Puzzles   |   Map Games   |   Spore Screenshots   |   Acai Berry