Nasa et al are valid authorities on this topic. Of course I am not doing first-hand primary research. That's silly. I am neither a scientist, nor do I have time to reinvent the wheel. That's what scientists are for, and most agree with me; I will take their understanding at face value over a laymans.

It''s not just NASA. The vast majority of credible scientific organizations say the same thing. That's far more reliable than some guy's random vlog documentary which has been proven dishonest.

I hope we get a white Christmas too, but if we did, it doesn't mean global warming isn't real. It just means your local conditions are cold.

Well, of course it was all blown way out of proportion by the media idiots - just like global warming is today.

__________________
A panda walks into a cafe. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and fires two shots in the air.

"Why?" asks the confused waiter, as the panda makes toward the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder.

"I'm a panda," he says at the door. "Look it up."

The waiter turns to the relevant entry and, sure enough, finds an explanation.

"Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves."

So now we don't trust NASA. Please. We're not conspiracy theorists.


Here is the denier cycle:
1.The earth isn't warming. Oh, it is?
2. Well then it's obviously not caused by humans. Oh, it is?
3. Well then it can't be bad for the planet?

You are, quite obviously, in stage 3.


I'm not speaking for Technocratic_Utilitarian, but I can say for myself I don't have all day to spend googling up scientific statistics.

By the way, you must not understand your sources. You linked to "The Great Global Warming Swindle", which besides being the biggest pile of unscientific crud I've ever seen, IS a documentary.

__________________
Thoughts on the World
Thoughts on Global Warming
The International Relations Blog
worldthoughts(at)gmail(dot)com

It's not that I am unable. It's that you won't understand any rebuttal. It would be like trying to explain evolution to that other idiot who insists evolution is impossible becaues mutations don't add any information. It's pointless trying to talk seriously to someone that stupid.

All this has been discussed before; it's all been discussed before and refuted. I will not do it repeatedly any more than I will consistantly pound reality into the retarded heads of Creationists. Once was enough. I already cited relevant, credible sources that contradict your glorified propaganda documentary. Given you wave your hands furiously and dismiss anything that doesn't agree with you, my assumption that you aren't capable of discussing this was correct.

What was that old song?

"I don't care if it rains or freezes;
So long as I have my plastic Jesus;
Sitting on the dashboard of my car..."

__________________
A panda walks into a cafe. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and fires two shots in the air.

"Why?" asks the confused waiter, as the panda makes toward the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder.

"I'm a panda," he says at the door. "Look it up."

The waiter turns to the relevant entry and, sure enough, finds an explanation.

"Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves."

Dude, the earth obviously is warming but you keep arguing the same point. How do you KNOW that CO2 and CO2 only is causing all or even some of the warming? Because the experts say so is a good argument.

To whom are you directing your post?

Suggestion: use the quote feature.

__________________
A panda walks into a cafe. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and fires two shots in the air.

"Why?" asks the confused waiter, as the panda makes toward the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder.

"I'm a panda," he says at the door. "Look it up."

The waiter turns to the relevant entry and, sure enough, finds an explanation.

"Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves."

Are you actually saying that the experts are right, or are you being facetious?

__________________
01100001 01101000 00100000 01101011 01101001 01101100 01101100 01100101 01100100 00100000 01100001 00100000 01101101 01100001 01101110 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01110100 01100101 01111000 01110101 01110011 00111111

Once again no rebuttal, or refutation of the information I provided. Once again, an impotent attack on me in lieu of any sort of argument. What I understand, and anyone who cares to make not of your responses can understand is that someone obviously told you that the information I provided had been debunked and you are simply parrotting what you have been told. Either you can refute the information or you can not. To date, you have not. Enough said.

There ares so many ways. I'll tell you a couple

1. Ice cores
As CO2 levels go up, temp. goes up. Understandable?

2. Venus and Mars
Venus has a 'runaway' greenhouse effect, meaning that the planet has tons upon tons of greenhouse gases, warming the planet. Mars has no greenhouse effect, and is much much cooler than the Earth. I believe this called the "Goldilocks Principle" or something like that.

__________________
Thoughts on the World
Thoughts on Global Warming
The International Relations Blog
worldthoughts(at)gmail(dot)com