Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site!

Go Back   Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums > Political Issues > Enviromental Issues

Enviromental Issues Discuss Environmental Issues here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2007, 04:53 AM
Congressman
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 7
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 584
Rep Power: 2
Matthew is on a distinguished road
Default The ***** of the pacific beats up global warming, causing it to loss number one.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/...bal.html#gtemp

2007 so far is the 4th warmest...The la nina took its chance to become number one away. The global avg with the land,sea was only .9f away from becoming number one. While the LA NINA caused the oceans to be .20f cooler.

Land global
2005 (+0.98°C/1.76°F)
2007 (+1.03°C (+1.85°F)

For the northern hemisphere it was over .31f making it the warmest ever. COOL.

So we loook at the oceans of the global, it was the 9th warmest with .70f, to 98 of the super el nino with .90f. That is .20f cooler this year. So it is likley that this year would of been number one baby if it was not for the strong LA NINA. At least based on this data...


The southern Hemisphere was cooler overall. With only making 9th overall.

This is if you want to trust this data. I have nothing what so ever against turning our planet into a nice warm tropical like planet the way it was a hundred million years ago. Cold and snow sucks,,,


If next year becomes number one, then 2009,2010 then beats it. Then I will reconsider the chance of global warming. Give us another 2-3 years to see a clear trend. These people think we will warm up 5 degree's by 2100?
__________________
"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton, June 2004.


"If we desire to avoid insult, we must be able to repel it; if we desire to secure peace, one of the most powerful instruments of our rising prosperity; it must be known, that we are at all times ready for war" -- George Washington, Fifth Annual Address to Congress, December 13, 1793
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2007, 10:44 AM
Simmons's Avatar
Citizen
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 104
Location: Earth
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 2
Simmons is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew View Post
If next year becomes number one, then 2009,2010 then beats it. Then I will reconsider the chance of global warming. Give us another 2-3 years to see a clear trend. These people think we will warm up 5 degree's by 2100?
That's what skeptics said 20 years ago. Then 10 years ago. We need to do something, soon.
__________________
Thoughts on the World
Thoughts on Global Warming
The International Relations Blog
worldthoughts(at)gmail(dot)com
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2007, 01:17 PM
Jesus H. Lincoln's Avatar
Resident Scientist
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 130
Location: Bloomington & Shelbyville, Indiana
Posts: 1,127
Rep Power: 3
Jesus H. Lincoln is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew View Post
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/...bal.html#gtemp

2007 so far is the 4th warmest...The la nina took its chance to become number one away. The global avg with the land,sea was only .9f away from becoming number one. While the LA NINA caused the oceans to be .20f cooler.

Land global
2005 (+0.98°C/1.76°F)
2007 (+1.03°C (+1.85°F)

For the northern hemisphere it was over .31f making it the warmest ever. COOL.

So we loook at the oceans of the global, it was the 9th warmest with .70f, to 98 of the super el nino with .90f. That is .20f cooler this year. So it is likley that this year would of been number one baby if it was not for the strong LA NINA. At least based on this data...


The southern Hemisphere was cooler overall. With only making 9th overall.

This is if you want to trust this data. I have nothing what so ever against turning our planet into a nice warm tropical like planet the way it was a hundred million years ago. Cold and snow sucks,,,


If next year becomes number one, then 2009,2010 then beats it. Then I will reconsider the chance of global warming. Give us another 2-3 years to see a clear trend. These people think we will warm up 5 degree's by 2100?
I'm glad you're looking at the evidence and reconsidering your opinion, but the trend is already noted. I guarantee you'll see what you expect.
__________________
01100001 01101000 00100000 01101011 01101001 01101100 01101100 01100101 01100100 00100000 01100001 00100000 01101101 01100001 01101110 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01110100 01100101 01111000 01110101 01110011 00111111
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2007, 09:40 PM
malrenalds's Avatar
Advisor
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 73
Location: Springfield
Posts: 3,096
Rep Power: 6
malrenalds is a jewel in the roughmalrenalds is a jewel in the rough
Default

I think that doing something now is better. Even if we are wrong about this. conservation is needed for other reasons.
__________________
===Quote of the day===
"The enemy of my enemy, can kiss my a$$ too."
Lilah from 'Angel'

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-16-2007, 09:45 PM
Jesus H. Lincoln's Avatar
Resident Scientist
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 130
Location: Bloomington & Shelbyville, Indiana
Posts: 1,127
Rep Power: 3
Jesus H. Lincoln is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by malrenalds View Post
I think that doing something now is better. Even if we are wrong about this. conservation is needed for other reasons.
Yeah, I'll never get people who oppose environmental measures. Even if they were less necessary because global warming weren't happening (which is, of course, not the case), why waste the environment just because of the economic bottom line? We've already seen what it does; just look back to the Industrial Revolution. There's a reason TR set aside so much area as National Parks.
__________________
01100001 01101000 00100000 01101011 01101001 01101100 01101100 01100101 01100100 00100000 01100001 00100000 01101101 01100001 01101110 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01110100 01100101 01111000 01110101 01110011 00111111
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On






     Top Political Sites  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 PM.
Political Fever 2007/2008
   Word Search   |   Family Friendly   |   AdSense Forum   |   Game Cheats   |   Coupon Codes   |   Spore Game   |   Xcode Forum   |   Political Forums   |   Internet Marketing   |   Social Networking    |   Sudoku   |   Mobile Marketing   |   Web Forms   |   Articles & News   |   Loans & Credit Repair   |   Online Coupon Codes   |   Loans   |   Sudoku Puzzles   |   Map Games   |   Spore Screenshots   |   Acai Berry