|
Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site! |
|
||||||
| Enviromental Issues Discuss Environmental Issues here. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/131047.pdf
__________________
"Have you no decency, sir? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?" -Joseph Welch |
|
||||
|
That is what I am talking about. That is addressing the why. The why is what is really important. If I had the time right now I would do the research, but I think that is what we need to see info on. That is where the a real divide is.
|
|
|||
|
Invest in the air conditioner business and buy frigidaire stock.
|
|
||||
|
__________________
|
|
||||
|
Who is to say in the next 40 years paradigm shifts won't be achieved in climate science? Are we just going to blame the global economic halt, due to expensive green requirements, on bad science? That article by Peterson reads like political coverage if you ask me.
but hey, I'm no scientist...yet
__________________
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Who says 2012 doesn't bring a paradigm shift as well. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|