Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site!

Go Back   Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums > Political Issues > Enviromental Issues

Enviromental Issues Discuss Environmental Issues here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-28-2007, 01:22 PM
Jimmy the Pro's Avatar
Citizen
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 66
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 2
Jimmy the Pro is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WindyCity View Post
I have a great dog. I think he is really smart. But:

1. He has yet to figure out how to feed himself. His food storage container is right next to his food bowl. He sees me scoop food from the container into the bowl twice each day.
2. He has yet to figure out how to let himself out. He sees me open the door for him several times a day. I think he tries to blame it on a lack of opposable thumbs.
3. The words "filet mignon" mean nothing to him. "Milk bone" sends him into an absolute tizzy.
These reasons are all results of Classical and Operant Conditioning of animals. An animal in the wild would act differently than normal housepets. Humans can undergo the same conditioning and be made to be pets. As unethical as the practice is, if started at an early age, key cognitive processes can be inhibited that would make a human act much like a dog, that is, completely dependent on it's master for survival.

Thus you've only illustrated the effects of conditioning on animals, not anything close to determining the level of rationality.


Quote:
Originally Posted by WC
4. I accidentally knock my dinner plate to the floor. The meat and bread disappear down his throat. The veggies I have to clean up. (I said he was smart!!)
Your dog has a taste for meat just as other animals have, including humans. I have stated earlier, there is nothing wrong for desiring to eat meat. The contradiction comes when you label it "wrong" to eat human meat. The dog you have that eats the meat and bread has never told you that it is "wrong" to eat dog meat. If you fed it to him or her, he or she may very well eat it. Therefore the dog is not guilty of contradiction.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WC
The basic communal nature of man precludes us from turning on each other as a source of food. If a society had to compete within itself to avoid being eaten by its own members, a civil existence would have been impossible.
Contrary to your warrentless claim that man's "basic communal nature" precludes him from eating another man, societies practicing cannibalism have functioned throughout ancient times and in order to survive, men have often been compelled to eat human flesh in modern times.

The flaw here is that you presuppose that a cannibalistic society would be a sort of Dawn of the Dead feeding frenzy where everyone nibbled at everyone else every day at every meal. Certainly you do not eat hamburger everyday of every meal do you? As far as the term civil goes, that is debatable but existence has proven true in many different societies.

Moreover, your argument that man's basic nature is a reason to exclude vegitarianism ignores the idea of a developed conscience. Certainly our basic nature compells us to survive, however we cannot simply shotgun anyone who poses the slightest threat to us, can we? If man has the cognitive ability to higher function, then we should recognize the contradiction in cosuming meat but calling it "wrong" to eat other humans.

Or the alternative, I believe it is wrong to eat humans, because humans are animals too, I believe that it is concurrently wrong to consume other animals. No contradiction.
__________________
"Democracy is being allowed to vote for the candidate you dislike the least." -Robert Byrne-
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-28-2007, 01:45 PM
Citizen
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 71
Location: Illidelph
Age: 1
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 0
blasphemy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy the Pro View Post
Here is how I see the rationality behind Vegetarianism.

People eat animals and think nothing of it, however when proposed with the idea of eating a human they sudder and claim that eating a human is "wrong".

However, a human is an animal just like the deer, quail, and cows we eat everyday.

Therefore I consider it a contradiction to be completely fine with eating an animal and calling it "wrong" to eat another human.

Either those who eat meat should have no problem with eating a human or they are irrational because of contradiction.

Thus because I cannot eat another human and call it "right", I see no point in eating any other animal and being okay with it.
Have you ever heard of the circle of life?

Deep down we are all just animals and you can't deny that there are animals who eat other animals that are below them in the food chain.

The idea of human eating another human as a justification is ridiculous.

I don't see any justification of vegatarianism as just except maybe for health reasons and thats if anyone has trouble eating meat. I know some people who just don't care for its texture. Fine by me.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 11-28-2007, 02:31 PM
Congressman
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 46
Posts: 232
Rep Power: 2
SVTman is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy the Pro View Post
Lower in intellect?

We can only go so far as to determine the mindset of an animal. Since we have not been animals ourselves we cannot discern their thought processes and therefore it is erronious to claim them as "lesser".

Animals seem to have a certain sense that is beyond humans in many cases of danger or otherwise.
i don't know if you have ever been in a dangerous situation and one that was prolonged. if you ever are you will realize that humans have a very good sense of danger and a very self protective nature when it come down to life and death.

another thing that makes humans different when it comes to eating a person is, when we hear eat a person we think about people that we know and have relationships with. i mean i'll bet there is no one here that would eat the family dog. is it because you can't? no the family dog is completely edible. we wont eat it becuase it is our friend. i think this is a reason we don't eat people. i mean the last time i checked i didn't know the cow i was eating personaly.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 11-28-2007, 03:33 PM
Oregon Elephant's Avatar
prrrrr.....
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 63
Age: 21
Posts: 7,751
Rep Power: 10
Oregon Elephant has a spectacular aura aboutOregon Elephant has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WindyCity View Post
I have a great dog. I think he is really smart. But:

he tries to blame it on a lack of opposable thumbs.
That reminds me off a Ron White comedy skit.
__________________
Set your destination with your heart, get there with your mind.

"The wisest men follow their own direction." - Euripides
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 11-28-2007, 03:40 PM
Oregon Elephant's Avatar
prrrrr.....
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 63
Age: 21
Posts: 7,751
Rep Power: 10
Oregon Elephant has a spectacular aura aboutOregon Elephant has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blasphemy View Post
Have you ever heard of the circle of life?

Deep down we are all just animals and you can't deny that there are animals who eat other animals that are below them in the food chain.

The idea of human eating another human as a justification is ridiculous.

I don't see any justification of vegatarianism as just except maybe for health reasons and thats if anyone has trouble eating meat. I know some people who just don't care for its texture. Fine by me.
I agree, I have no problem with those that choose not to eat meat because they don't like the texture or the taste. I had a friend in high school that wouldn't eat meat because animals are too cute to eat and it isn't nice to kill them to eat.

We got in a heated debate on a band trip about whether it is fair to kill plants to eat if it isn't fair to kill cows to eat. We got into things like plants don't have feelings and I could probably debate that to some point but at the time I was just having fun with her (not in that way), so the next day I brought a CD to school (which surprisingly our school didn't mind that students listened to CDs in class) with the song Carrot Juice is Murder.
__________________
Set your destination with your heart, get there with your mind.

"The wisest men follow their own direction." - Euripides
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 11-28-2007, 04:02 PM
Citizen
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 68
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 0
kamehameha34 is on a distinguished road
Default

The fact that we won't eat something that shares a common trait with something that we would eat is not a contradiction. You're basing your argument off of what is called the guilt by association fallacy.

For example, I don't have a particular taste for roses. Does this mean that it's hypocritical or contradictory to eat anything that's red? Of course not. I don't like the taste.

People don't eat other people because we've developed an evolutionary or societal aversion to eating the flesh of our own kind.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 11-28-2007, 04:37 PM
Congressman
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 46
Posts: 232
Rep Power: 2
SVTman is on a distinguished road
Default

i think that it is funny that there are people out there that don't eat meat even though we are obviously made to eat both or we wouldn't have k9's. its funny because we are talking about people eating people. what about animals eating people. and let me tell you it happens. where i used to live they had mountin lions. well a lady decided to go out joging on one of the trails that is alittle farther from town then was necesary and se was atacked and eaten by a mountin lion. it ate what it needed at the time and if you know about mountin lions you know that they will hide there prey for latter. well they founder buried under a pile of leaves and brush. just because you are a vegitarian doesn't mean you have left the food chain. that is sarcasm please dont kill me for saying it.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 11-28-2007, 06:47 PM
Congressman
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 47
Location: My name says it all
Posts: 105
Rep Power: 2
WindyCity is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
societies practicing cannibalism have functioned throughout ancient times and in order to survive, men have often been compelled to eat human flesh in modern times.
Hopefully this doesn't offend any functioning cannibals who may be reading this, but, desperate times call for desperate measures:

Quote:
Scene: The interior of a lifeboat. Seagulls are crying.)

Sailor #1: Still no sign of land. How long is it?

Sailor #2: That's a rather personal question, sir.

Sailor #1: (low voice)You stupid git. I meant how long has it been in the lifeboat? You've destroyed the atmosphere now.

Sailor #2: I'm sorry.

Sailor #1: Shut up. Start again.

Sailor #1: Still no sign of land. How long is it?

Sailor #2: 33 days, sir.

Sailor #1: Thirty-three days?

Sailor #2: We can't go on much longer. (low voices) I didn't think I destroyed the atmosphere.

Sailor #1: Shut up.

Sailor #2: Well, I don't think I did.

Sailor #1: 'Course you did.

Sailor #2: (aside, to 3) Did you think I destroyed the atmosphere?

Sailor #3: Yes I think you did.

Sailor #1: Shut up. Shut up!

Sailor #1: Still no sign of land. How long is it?

Sailor #2: 33 days, sir.

Sailor #4: Have we started again? (slap)

Sailor #1: STILL no sign of land. How long is it?

Sailor #2: 33 days, sir.

Sailor #1: Thirty-three days?

Sailor #2: We can't go on much longer, sir. We haven't eaten since the fifth day.

Sailor #5: We're done for, we're done for!

Sailor #1: Shut up, Morley.

Sailor #2: We've just got to keep hoping. Someone may find us.

Sailor #4: How we feeling, Captain?

Sailor #5: Not too good. I...I feel so weak.

Sailor #2: We can't hold out much longer.

Sailor #5: Listen...chaps...there's still a chance. I'm...done for, I've...got a gamy leg and I'm going fast; I'll never get through. But...some of you might. So...you'd better eat me.

Sailor #1: Eat you, sir?

Sailor #5: Yes. Eat me.

Sailor #2: Iiuuhh! With a gamy leg?

Sailor #5: You didn't eat the leg, Thompson. There's still plenty of good meat. Look at that arm.

Sailor #3: It's not just the leg, sir.

Sailor #5: What do you mean?

Sailor #5: Well, sir...it's just that -

Sailor #5: Why don't you want to eat me?

Sailor #3: I'd rather eat Johnson, sir! (points to sailor #4)

Sailor #2: So would I, sir.

Sailor #5: I see.

Sailor #4: Well that's settled then...everyone's gonna eat me!

Sailor #1: Uh, well.

Sailor #5: What, sir?

Sailor #1:: No, no you go ahead, please, I won't.......

Sailor #4: Oh nonsense, sir, you're starving; ducking.

Sailor #1: No, no, it's not that.

Sailor #2: What's the matter with Johnson, sir?

Sailor #1: Well, he's not kosher.

Sailor #3: That depends how we kill him, sir.

Sailor #1: Yes, that's true. But to be perfectly frank I...I like my meat a little more lean. I'd rather eat Hodges.

Sailor #2: Oh well, all right.

Sailor #5: I still prefer Johnson.

Sailor #5: I wish you'd all stop bickering and eat me.

Sailor #2: Look. I tell you what. Those who want to can eat Johnson. And you, sir, can have my leg. And we make some stock from the Captain, and then we'll have Johnson cold for supper.

Sailor #1: Good thinking, Hodges.

Sailor #4: And we'll finish off with the peaches. (picks up a tin of . peaches)

Sailor #3: And we can start off with the avocados. (picks up two avocados) Sailor #1: Waitress! (a waitress walks in) We've decided now, we're going to have leg of Hodges...

(Boos off-screen. Cut to a letter.)

Voice Over: Dear Sir, I am glad to hear that your studio audience disapproves of the last skit as strongly as I. As a naval officer I abhor the implication that the Royal Navy is a haven for cannibalism. It is well known that we now have the problem relatively under control, and that it is the RAF who now suffer the largest casualties in this area. And what do you think the Argylls ate in Aden. Arabs? Yours etc. Captain B.J. Smethwick in a white wine sauce with shallots, mushrooms and garlic.
Credit: Monty Python, The Lifeboat Skit, Episode 26, 1970
__________________
"Civilization is mortally wounded and something truly evil is being born to take its place." - Stephen Coonts novel "The Traitor"

Best recent book: - "Protect and Defend" by Vince Flynn
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2007, 07:28 PM
mlurp's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 76
Location: USA
Posts: 3,475
Rep Power: 5
mlurp is on a distinguished road
Default

The way I see it is if you want to eat vegies that is fine. Your lean, clean and healthy. So when we run out of meat to eat guess what. Some others won't change over to vegies. So you become the meal. Loooool just joking...... But I don't think other are.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2007, 11:40 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 1
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Age: 19
Posts: 2,102
Rep Power: 0
Dustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Well is it hard to be a vegetarian? What is the main meal really?
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On






     Top Political Sites  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03 PM.
Political Fever 2007/2008
   Word Search   |   Family Friendly   |   AdSense Forum   |   Game Cheats   |   Coupon Codes   |   Spore Game   |   Xcode Forum   |   Political Forums   |   Internet Marketing   |   Social Networking    |   Sudoku   |   Mobile Marketing   |   Web Forms   |   Articles & News   |   Loans & Credit Repair   |   Online Coupon Codes   |   Loans   |   Sudoku Puzzles   |   Map Games   |   Spore Screenshots   |   Acai Berry