Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site!

Go Back   Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums > Political Issues > Enviromental Issues

Enviromental Issues Discuss Environmental Issues here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-27-2007, 01:49 AM
Congressman
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 7
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 584
Rep Power: 2
Matthew is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ict1523 View Post
Yea, but the problem with this argument is you picked a huge mega El Nino year...the next few years have not had such strong Ninos but were still very much above average and warmer than years previous to 1998.
True but it has not warmed up after 2005 any ways. We will see, but in all likely hood with a solar min. I would lean to a cooler period.
__________________
"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton, June 2004.


"If we desire to avoid insult, we must be able to repel it; if we desire to secure peace, one of the most powerful instruments of our rising prosperity; it must be known, that we are at all times ready for war" -- George Washington, Fifth Annual Address to Congress, December 13, 1793
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-2007, 10:55 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 91
Location: New Jersassistan
Age: 24
Posts: 2,645
Rep Power: 0
Technocratic_Utilitarian will become famous soon enough
Default

Global Warming is a serious issue. I do think humans are partly the problem, but I think we are so in more than one way. If we were really serious about mitigating that and the Peak Oil crises, would would invest in more green energy sources such as Fission.

People are underestimating the seriousness of the problem, and the fear of nuclear power is a contributor to it.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 12-05-2007, 03:03 PM
Simmons's Avatar
Citizen
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 104
Location: Earth
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 2
Simmons is on a distinguished road
Default

If any of you 'skeptics' would actually like to debate the science rather than making the same points over and over again (global cooling, can't even predict the weather, etc.) I'd be plenty happy to do that.
__________________
Thoughts on the World
Thoughts on Global Warming
The International Relations Blog
worldthoughts(at)gmail(dot)com
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 12-05-2007, 11:12 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 1
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Age: 19
Posts: 2,102
Rep Power: 0
Dustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond reputeDustin has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Sure thing.

What about the solar cycle? How about that we've been only able to keep track of the weather for 200 years? Or the fact that global patterns are having more of an influence. What about 1998 not being the warmest year on record?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 12-05-2007, 11:17 PM
Congressman
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 7
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 584
Rep Power: 2
Matthew is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dustin View Post
Sure thing.

What about the solar cycle? How about that we've been only able to keep track of the weather for 200 years? Or the fact that global patterns are having more of an influence. What about 1998 not being the warmest year on record?
All true my friend. The solar min should make the next 20 years slide downwards into the pit. Much of the southern Hem is already seeing record sea ice and the coldest winter in almost a hundred years. The northern is starting to have some impressive record snows and cold. We will need to see what the trend, but if this is the start. Then global warming could be totally and utterly disproved in 5 years. We will see.
__________________
"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton, June 2004.


"If we desire to avoid insult, we must be able to repel it; if we desire to secure peace, one of the most powerful instruments of our rising prosperity; it must be known, that we are at all times ready for war" -- George Washington, Fifth Annual Address to Congress, December 13, 1793
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2007, 02:11 PM
Zephyr's Avatar
Obama's Socialist Goon
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 58
Location: Wouldn't you like to know.
Age: 17
Posts: 4,642
Rep Power: 7
Zephyr is a jewel in the roughZephyr is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:

What about the solar cycle? How about that we've been only able to keep track of the weather for 200 years? Or the fact that global patterns are having more of an influence. What about 1998 not being the warmest year on record?
What about every year since 1998 being the warmest year on record? What about the ice samples showing a correlation between atmospheric carbon dioxide and temperature rise for the last 600,000 years? It's hard to take the skeptics seriously when, again, the number of peer-reviewed studies stating that global warming isn't,to some degree, human-caused, is zero.
__________________
"Moreover, I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states...Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial "outside agitator" idea. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds."



~Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2007, 05:15 PM
Simmons's Avatar
Citizen
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 104
Location: Earth
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 2
Simmons is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dustin View Post
Sure thing.

What about the solar cycle? How about that we've been only able to keep track of the weather for 200 years? Or the fact that global patterns are having more of an influence. What about 1998 not being the warmest year on record?
Oh please. This has got to be the oldest skeptic argument and it has been disproved oh so many times.

According to the Max Planck Institute, there has been little increase in solar irradiance since 1940 (the radiation is in blue). There's no correlation after 1940. At all.



And if you don't believe that, the PMOD at the World Radiation Center has records back to 1978.

Next!
__________________
Thoughts on the World
Thoughts on Global Warming
The International Relations Blog
worldthoughts(at)gmail(dot)com
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 12-12-2007, 12:15 PM
palerider's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 141
Posts: 403
Rep Power: 2
palerider is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oregon Elephant View Post
The computers aren't able to predict how the climate will be in 6 months, but they can accurately predict what kind of weather will accure with different sea and air temps, along with air preasure, they just can't predict the temps and preasures very well. But there is a differrence between predicting a storm next year, and prediciting what will happen to the climate as an average whole.

The models don't accurately reflect daily observed data. Exactly how much faith are you willing to put into any model that can't even reflect current conditions or accurately represent past climate even when it has data from the past as part of its programming?

The fact is that the ice started melting some 14,000 years ago and has melted back from most of the northern hemisphere. What, exactly, is so surprising about the fact that it continues to melt?
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 12-12-2007, 03:24 PM
Simmons's Avatar
Citizen
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 104
Location: Earth
Posts: 80
Rep Power: 2
Simmons is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by palerider View Post
The fact is that the ice started melting some 14,000 years ago and has melted back from most of the northern hemisphere. What, exactly, is so surprising about the fact that it continues to melt?
Not at the speed it is right now.

See, for example:http://thoughtsonglobalwarming.blogs...at-record.html
__________________
Thoughts on the World
Thoughts on Global Warming
The International Relations Blog
worldthoughts(at)gmail(dot)com
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 12-12-2007, 04:27 PM
Citizen
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 140
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 0
Kevin is on a distinguished road
Default

This is simply not a classic greenhouse gas warming signature. The climate models demand that the warming be 2-3 times greater at the mid trop (the greenhouse layer) than at the surface. And since the warming is actually less at the mid trop than the lower trop, we can assume that these climate models that show such significant warming either do one of two things or both.

1) Overdo the power of these greenhouse gases or

2) Do not include as many negative feedbacks as is currently happening.

Simmons, do you really want to bring ice cover into this? The south pole just hit the most above normal ice extent ever recorded today. It is above normal by about +1.5 million km-2 beating the record of +1.25 million km-2 in 2003 by 20%.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On






     Top Political Sites  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 PM.
Political Fever 2007/2008
   Word Search   |   Family Friendly   |   AdSense Forum   |   Game Cheats   |   Coupon Codes   |   Spore Game   |   Xcode Forum   |   Political Forums   |   Internet Marketing   |   Social Networking    |   Sudoku   |   Mobile Marketing   |   Web Forms   |   Articles & News   |   Loans & Credit Repair   |   Online Coupon Codes   |   Loans   |   Sudoku Puzzles   |   Map Games   |   Spore Screenshots   |   Acai Berry