Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site!

Go Back   Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums > Political Issues > Economics

Economics Discuss Economics here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2008, 02:01 PM
TheStripey1's Avatar
Recovering republican
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Userid: 396
Location: California
Posts: 1,199
Rep Power: 2
TheStripey1 will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael View Post
The CEO's and executive teams have obviously consulted with accountants about what would happen with their personal profits if more refineries were built as opposed to using refineries as a market manipulation factor to keep prices artificially high.

I keep looking at all of the options including a windfall profits tax to be spent on building new refineries to force the oil companies to move in that direction. My guess, being the money grubbing sociopaths that they are, is that the windfall profits tax would be passed on to consumers.

So my alternative is to specifically target every last single CEO and executive for a full tax statement orofice search by the IRS (sound of a latex glove snapping on). Maybe they could go to extra efforts to investigate offshore banking. My guess is that they all use offshore accounts. I would even go so far as to engage the same surveillance Bush wants on us peasants be used on them to discover offshore accounts.

As the old proverb says, don't get mad - get even.
Makes note in pawpilot not to piss off Michael...

Excellent idea, Michael! Let's go after the CEOs...

__________________
I cannot teach anybody anything, I can only make them think.
~~Socrates

My UPDATED Pep Talk For Lefties and Lurkers

Reply With Quote
  #82 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2008, 02:05 PM
TheStripey1's Avatar
Recovering republican
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Userid: 396
Location: California
Posts: 1,199
Rep Power: 2
TheStripey1 will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael View Post
"Oh, and it would be nice if we didn't keep letting these slimy weasels to skip out of the country. I consider outsourcing to be vaguely treasonous."

I keep hearing about Trickle Down economics again. My first thought is the only trickle down I hear is the super rich p*ssing on the middle class to whom they have shifted most of the tax burden. My second thought is that what I am seeing is Trickle Out economics. They are outsourcing jobs while using offshore banking to not pay taxes. That money inputs into other national economies. Therefore they are not supporting the American infrastructure that has facilitated their wealth. In short, it is a form of economic treason.
Cmon Michael, you know as well as I that it's the bottom line that matters...

For instance, in order for the Waltons to make billion$, they have to support the outsourcing of $40,000 or $50,000 a year manufacturing jobs to China, so they can import their cheaply made products to be sold at their stores so those who used to have those jobs can save $2500 on crap they don't really need in the first place.
__________________
I cannot teach anybody anything, I can only make them think.
~~Socrates

My UPDATED Pep Talk For Lefties and Lurkers

Reply With Quote
  #83 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2008, 02:08 PM
TheStripey1's Avatar
Recovering republican
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Userid: 396
Location: California
Posts: 1,199
Rep Power: 2
TheStripey1 will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern Man View Post
Its not zoned for that, sorry. How about in all those dormant industrial areas where the stuff is produced? "Brownfields".

Good idea...

maybe you could convince the oil company CEOs to stop dragging their feet and actually build some new refineries there.

I heard a few weeks ago someone suggest using closed military bases which seemed like a good idea to me at the time. I have since learned the oil companies don't like that idea because the bases are not close to existing pipelines. So I'm thinking, the brownfields would also have to be close to those pipelines.


Are they?
__________________
I cannot teach anybody anything, I can only make them think.
~~Socrates

My UPDATED Pep Talk For Lefties and Lurkers

Reply With Quote
  #84 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2008, 02:10 PM
TheStripey1's Avatar
Recovering republican
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Userid: 396
Location: California
Posts: 1,199
Rep Power: 2
TheStripey1 will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern Man View Post
Yucca Mountain, and under the plants like they do in France.

Yucca Mountain is on a seismic fault... so therefore it is not really a good place to store crap that will be radioactive for billions of years...



edit to add: don't they build those waste receptcles under the plants BEFORE they build the plant? Be kind of hard to retrofit our existing plants right now, don't you think?
__________________
I cannot teach anybody anything, I can only make them think.
~~Socrates

My UPDATED Pep Talk For Lefties and Lurkers

Reply With Quote
  #85 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2008, 02:21 PM
Michael's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 166
Location: Sierra Mountains
Posts: 7,381
Rep Power: 8
Michael has a spectacular aura about
Default

Stripey:

And my bottom line is America first. We need sanctions against outsourcing. We need to use of our homeland security overkill on surveillance of normal citizens for tapping into the transactions of all those offshore bank accounts in the Cayman Islands.

Then there is the good old fashioned French Revolution approach. Marie Antoinette said the peasants could eat the crumbs that fell from the royal table. She got beheaded.

Vive La Revolution
__________________
National Debt =
Reply With Quote
  #86 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2008, 05:33 PM
Southern Man's Avatar
Proud American since 1865
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Userid: 440
Location: The beautiful Yadkin Valley
Posts: 1,602
Rep Power: 2
Southern Man is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheStripey1 View Post
Good idea...

maybe you could convince the oil company CEOs to stop dragging their feet and actually build some new refineries there.

I heard a few weeks ago someone suggest using closed military bases which seemed like a good idea to me at the time. I have since learned the oil companies don't like that idea because the bases are not close to existing pipelines. So I'm thinking, the brownfields would also have to be close to those pipelines.


Are they?
I think the people who are dragging their feet are the environmentalists. Stifling growth suits both their stated and actual agenda. I don't see why a CEO beholden to stockholders would want to stifle growth in his company, since stock value is dependent on growth potential.

Military bases are typically as far away from urban areas as possible. But not always. Brownfields are typically in urban areas. Pipelines typically go to urban areas to feed "tank farms", which of course, feed the urbanites huge appetite for fuel.
Reply With Quote
  #87 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2008, 05:51 PM
Southern Man's Avatar
Proud American since 1865
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Userid: 440
Location: The beautiful Yadkin Valley
Posts: 1,602
Rep Power: 2
Southern Man is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheStripey1 View Post
Yucca Mountain is on a seismic fault... so therefore it is not really a good place to store crap that will be radioactive for billions of years...



edit to add: don't they build those waste receptcles under the plants BEFORE they build the plant? Be kind of hard to retrofit our existing plants right now, don't you think?
There are faults everywhere. The vast majority are small and inactive, just like Yucca Mountains. The reason why we know about them at Yucca speaks to the tremendous detail of the geotechnical studies that have been done there. My understanding of the Yucca faults is that they haven’t been active for millions of years and that it sits in one of the most stable regions on the continent. This makes perfect since most fault activity occurs near the edges of continents, and Yucca is fairly near the geographical center.

I think the term “billions of years” is an exaggeration. Regardless, the life of the facility should be long enough to safely store the material until such time that the technology exists to reprocess it or make it inert. With that in mind 100 years would be reasonable. Others think differently so a longer time period is the goal. If that design life is exceeded, renovations could be done to extend the life at that point in time, or a new facility built and the waste moved to it. That is a common and well known occurrence with any structure.

I don’t know the details about French storage techniques. But a “plant” is typically several hundred acres of land with only a small fraction occupied by actual buildings. So I think we would be talking about building containment under vacant land. Regardless a deep vertical shaft could be built next to a building and a horizontal rock tunnel dug under it. That is a common construction technique for deep tunnels.
Reply With Quote
  #88 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2008, 07:01 PM
TheStripey1's Avatar
Recovering republican
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Userid: 396
Location: California
Posts: 1,199
Rep Power: 2
TheStripey1 will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern Man View Post
I think the people who are dragging their feet are the environmentalists. Stifling growth suits both their stated and actual agenda. I don't see why a CEO beholden to stockholders would want to stifle growth in his company, since stock value is dependent on growth potential.

Military bases are typically as far away from urban areas as possible. But not always. Brownfields are typically in urban areas. Pipelines typically go to urban areas to feed "tank farms", which of course, feed the urbanites huge appetite for fuel.
Did you read the article wannabehippie put up? or just discount it out of hand because it came from the Washington Post?

In it it quotes oil company execs saying it is not in their best financial interests to build new refineries at the time of the article... maybe with gas and oil prices at record heights, they'd answer differently now.

Blame those who can but choose not to. The oil companies.

Got record profits quarter after quarter?

why yes... yes they do...
__________________
I cannot teach anybody anything, I can only make them think.
~~Socrates

My UPDATED Pep Talk For Lefties and Lurkers

Reply With Quote
  #89 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2008, 08:29 PM
mlurp's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 76
Location: USA
Posts: 3,475
Rep Power: 5
mlurp is on a distinguished road
Default

And the record profit go to 2 groups The CEO's/Board members and the shareholders.

The share holders should demand increase capabilities looking for growth as the way to reap more profits in the long run.
__________________
Yea can't keep the words of your great leader.

Prophet Muhammad - “Do you love your creator? Love your fellow-beings first.”
Reply With Quote
  #90 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2008, 12:48 PM
Birdzeye's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Userid: 596
Posts: 877
Rep Power: 1
Birdzeye is on a distinguished road
Default

Amazing how the rightwingers blame the environmentalists for no new refineries, when it's actually because the oil companies (admittedly) aren't building them because it's "not in their best financial interests." Grrrr.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On






     Top Political Sites  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25 PM.
Political Fever 2007/2008
   Word Search   |   Family Friendly   |   AdSense Forum   |   Game Cheats   |   Coupon Codes   |   Spore Game   |   Xcode Forum   |   Political Forums   |   Internet Marketing   |   Social Networking    |   Sudoku   |   Mobile Marketing   |   Web Forms   |   Articles & News   |   Loans & Credit Repair   |   Online Coupon Codes   |   Loans   |   Sudoku Puzzles   |   Map Games   |   Spore Screenshots