Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site!

Go Back   Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums > Political Issues > Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Discuss Civil Liberties and Civil rights here. Also discuss discrimination against minority groups as well, and ways to solve these issues.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #141 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-2008, 06:45 AM
Finny's Avatar
Politically Incorrect
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Userid: 263
Location: Columbus,OH
Posts: 2,888
Rep Power: 3
Finny is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leviathon435 View Post
And yes, you might argue that violence helped but only peaceful tactics brought a solution and your logic brings some shocking results.
And that's the point. To shock the system. You aren't going to shock the system by marching. July 12th, probably over 25,000, maybe more.. will be at the US Capital in Washington D.C. just to hear Ron Paul speak. Do you think the controlling figures in Media are going to talk about it?


Quote:
Originally Posted by leviathon435 View Post
What about Islamic terrorists?
What about them? They use tactics to get themselves heard, because US, UK, and most of Europe didn't listen to them when they tried to peacefully give their complaints.

Quote:
Originally Posted by leviathon435 View Post
Their immediate aim is to push the west out of the ME and Islamic nations, not exactly a terrible aim (and yes I know about further aims which are not so reasonable) so should they be allowed to use violence to achieve their aims?
Yep, I have no problem with that. It's called being fair. If we are going to in such manner towards England, then they have every right to do so themselves. Even if we didn't do it towards England, they still have that right.


Quote:
Originally Posted by leviathon435 View Post
And what about the FARC and ETA, should they be allowed to use violence to achieve their aims, what you must suggest is that some people ca n use violence but others can't, depending on whether you agree with their aims.
Yes, I have no issue if FARC or the ETA uses these tactics. I only have an issue with FARC and ETA on their ideology.. but it still doesn't mean I stand with many who say Terrorism is bad. It's not. Terrorism is a tactic and it works.

The issue is we have to adjust from the idea that Wars are conventional still. Conventional wars ended during Vietnam.. when the Viet Cong showed us what Terrorism does. I also look at Terrorism as a form of Guerrilla Warfare.
__________________
Pioneers are walking all around singing songs about Lenin and they should be shot for it.

Handlebars

"If you are looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror"- V

It is inaccurate to say that I hate everything. I am strongly in favor of common sense, common honesty, and common decency. This makes me forever ineligible for public office.
H. L. Mencken

come on you know you wanna play football..

Beagán agus a rá go maith.

Economic Left/Right: 3.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.87
Reply With Quote
  #142 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-2008, 07:19 AM
xjoe3x's Avatar
Serae dubbs thee poo bear
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 206
Age: 21
Posts: 7,270
Rep Power: 9
xjoe3x has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leviathon435 View Post
Joe: I did just try to reply to you but it failed and now I've lost it so I'll do it later when I've got the time again.
It happens.
Reply With Quote
  #143 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-2008, 11:44 AM
Skerlnik's Avatar
Git-R-Done Despotism
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Userid: 584
Location: Tucson
Age: 36
Posts: 2,287
Rep Power: 4
Skerlnik has a spectacular aura aboutSkerlnik has a spectacular aura about
Default

Ay-yi-yi. Enough with the Consturbation already.
__________________
"Oh, bother", said Pooh, as he chambered another round...
Reply With Quote
  #144 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2008, 11:22 AM
leviathon435's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 147
Location: Nottingham, England
Age: 17
Posts: 7,118
Rep Power: 9
leviathon435 has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finny View Post
And that's the point. To shock the system. You aren't going to shock the system by marching. July 12th, probably over 25,000, maybe more.. will be at the US Capital in Washington D.C. just to hear Ron Paul speak. Do you think the controlling figures in Media are going to talk about it?

What about them? They use tactics to get themselves heard, because US, UK, and most of Europe didn't listen to them when they tried to peacefully give their complaints.

Yep, I have no problem with that. It's called being fair. If we are going to in such manner towards England, then they have every right to do so themselves. Even if we didn't do it towards England, they still have that right.

Yes, I have no issue if FARC or the ETA uses these tactics. I only have an issue with FARC and ETA on their ideology.. but it still doesn't mean I stand with many who say Terrorism is bad. It's not. Terrorism is a tactic and it works.

The issue is we have to adjust from the idea that Wars are conventional still. Conventional wars ended during Vietnam.. when the Viet Cong showed us what Terrorism does. I also look at Terrorism as a form of Guerrilla Warfare.
Well here we come to another complete ideological difference, I think terrorism in itself is wrong which is a key reason as to why I wouldn't call myself an ally of the FARC. I'm sorry but I think there's little chance of debate if you think that killing/harming innocents is acceptable, indeed a "right" nonetheless.
__________________
Trust me, I'm a socialist!

There's power in a factory,power in the land, power in the hand of the worker. But it all amounts to nothing if together we don't stand, there is power in a union.
The union forever defending our rights, down with the blackleg, workers unite. To our brothers and our sisters in many far off lands, there is power in a union.
Money speaks for money, the devil for his own. - Billy Bragg
Reply With Quote
  #145 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2008, 11:31 AM
leviathon435's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 147
Location: Nottingham, England
Age: 17
Posts: 7,118
Rep Power: 9
leviathon435 has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xjoe3x View Post
Well since there are more uses to gun than that it is more limiting.

Shooting someone is appropriate sometimes.
All these are uses based on the original purpose to kill, target practice is getting better at aiming at what you want to kill, hunting is killing animals, urmm, I can't actually think of any other uses but I've made my point.

From your other points I think we have two main points of contention: firstly that you have a right to kill someone threatening you and secondly that prison is, or rather should be, about punishment.

I don't agree that you have the right to kill someone even if they are threatening you, by killing them or even by having the means of killing them you pose a threat to them. Now I'm sure you'll tell me that they threatened you first but ultimately in most cases by bringing a gun into a situation you force a standoff, you force the other guy to flee or fight. If he flees then brilliant, but if he fights then someone dies, and in my book being a criminal does not mean you deserve to die. It is said that two wrongs don't make a right, and I agree, someone threatening you and taking away from your freedom does not give you the right to do the same to them, at least IMO.

The other point about prison I think we've argued before and it goes off-topic, but basically my position is that prison should be about protecting society and rehabilitation not punishment alone, just as you punish a child to teach them to behave so the same should be with criminals.
__________________
Trust me, I'm a socialist!

There's power in a factory,power in the land, power in the hand of the worker. But it all amounts to nothing if together we don't stand, there is power in a union.
The union forever defending our rights, down with the blackleg, workers unite. To our brothers and our sisters in many far off lands, there is power in a union.
Money speaks for money, the devil for his own. - Billy Bragg
Reply With Quote
  #146 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2008, 11:43 AM
xjoe3x's Avatar
Serae dubbs thee poo bear
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 206
Age: 21
Posts: 7,270
Rep Power: 9
xjoe3x has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leviathon435 View Post
All these are uses based on the original purpose to kill, target practice is getting better at aiming at what you want to kill, hunting is killing animals, urmm, I can't actually think of any other uses but I've made my point.

From your other points I think we have two main points of contention: firstly that you have a right to kill someone threatening you and secondly that prison is, or rather should be, about punishment.

I don't agree that you have the right to kill someone even if they are threatening you, by killing them or even by having the means of killing them you pose a threat to them. Now I'm sure you'll tell me that they threatened you first but ultimately in most cases by bringing a gun into a situation you force a standoff, you force the other guy to flee or fight. If he flees then brilliant, but if he fights then someone dies, and in my book being a criminal does not mean you deserve to die. It is said that two wrongs don't make a right, and I agree, someone threatening you and taking away from your freedom does not give you the right to do the same to them, at least IMO.

The other point about prison I think we've argued before and it goes off-topic, but basically my position is that prison should be about protecting society and rehabilitation not punishment alone, just as you punish a child to teach them to behave so the same should be with criminals.
Not quite, some guns were designed to injure.(like many assault rifles)
Some are designed for target shooting, as a sport.
Not to mention the mere sight of a gun can scare a criminal off without any shooting needed.

It is not only to kill.

So you are completely against self defense? You disagree that if someone tries to kill you, lets say for the sake of example an angry person at a bar, you should either try to run and hide or die. That is just unacceptable to me.
A stand-off is much better than the options of getting robbed, assaulted, or dying. They take the risk or getting hurt or dying when they attack someone.

Yes, we have. I think justice is about retribution for the victims. I think it is an organized version entrusted to our government.

Last edited by xjoe3x : 06-12-2008 at 11:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On






     Top Political Sites  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 AM.
Political Fever 2007/2008
   Word Search   |   Family Friendly   |   AdSense Forum   |   Game Cheats   |   Coupon Codes   |   Spore Game   |   Xcode Forum   |   Political Forums   |   Internet Marketing   |   Social Networking    |   Sudoku   |   Mobile Marketing   |   Web Forms   |   Articles & News   |   Loans & Credit Repair   |   Online Coupon Codes   |   Loans   |   Sudoku Puzzles   |   Map Games   |   Spore Screenshots   |   Acai Berry