|
Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site! |
|
||||||
| American Politics This is the main forum of political fever. This forum can be used for anything political, from the 08 election to the war in Iraq! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Michael, Yes Hoover had a role, Hoover RAISED TAXES and it made it worse. Second.. FDR made the Great Depression worse as well. He kept Taxes high and spent like a drunken sailor, on top of that he slaughtered millions of cattle and pigs.. to try and raise prices in a DEFLATIONARY period.. that prolonged the depression even further.. under almost 8 years.. FDR did nothing, but prolonged it.. it took a war for us to get out of the Great Depression.. where 14 million men were drafted (given jobs).
__________________
Pioneers are walking all around singing songs about Lenin and they should be shot for it. Handlebars "If you are looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror"- V It is inaccurate to say that I hate everything. I am strongly in favor of common sense, common honesty, and common decency. This makes me forever ineligible for public office. H. L. Mencken come on you know you wanna play football.. Beagán agus a rá go maith. Economic Left/Right: 3.75 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.87 |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Obama And Bush Meeting At White House (VIDEO and SLIDESHOW)What can Obama do? |
|
||||
Obama's Meet The Press Interview: General Eric Shinseki To Be Veterans Affairs Secretary (VIDEO)Wow...Secretary of Veterans Affairs...the only general who had it right and the stones to speak out about it is now Secretary of Veterans Affairs...seems like a waste of talent...this was just a token slap in the face. |
|
||||
Bloomberg.com: ExclusiveThis is a bad idea. NASA is a socialistic based enterprise. Like all such endeavors a concerted effort must be maintained to keep it moving along. Take the USSR and jet aircraft. This was an area where plenty of resources were expended and as a result, technological advancements were made. In fact, the USA stole or if you prefer, copied those advancements. Just as the USA poured massive amounts of resources into computer development and as a result left the USSR far behind and resorting to pirating our technologies. Both Reagan and Bush jr tried to run NASA as a business and as a result, caused shuttle craft to crash and burn. NASA wasn't set up to run as a business and trying to run it as one put inordinate strain on its infrastructure. Reagan tried to "push" shuttle launches from four a year to twelve a year and Bush jr tried to "cut costs" which resulted in inferior workmanship. Now Obama is going to throw the military at NASA and as a result the flaws in the way the military carries out its missions will transfer to NASA and cause all sorts of problems. An example of such a flaw is PTSD. The military has no problem while PTSD infects those in the military as long as the current mission is carried out. And the military has no problem afterward because it dumps the infected solders onto the society. But the problem exists. The Raw Story | Army-wide probe of vets 'involved in violent crimes' mulledSee the problem? See why the military doesn't care about the problem? One can only wonder how thinking such as this which is pervasive in the military structure is going to affect a program like NASA. Probably another shuttle crash is in our future... Obama gets a big fat "F" for this.... |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Been shoveling that brown stuff out of the stables again, haven't you? So...if it took a war to get us out of the Great Depression, how did you explain the fact that the top tax rate went up to 94% and whole industries were nationalized?? You can't have it both ways, Fins, not even with your radically revised version of history: Either FDR got us out of it or the heavily socialized policies of the government in the 1940's did. YOUR rightwing solution of tax cuts and deregulation DID NOT. I know you don't like it, but you'd better learn to live with it... But to deal directly with your original flatly ridiculous claim, it's clear that you're basing your ignorant New Deal revisionism on the short-lived recession in a year straddling 1937 and 1938. But that was four years into Roosevelt’s term—four years marked by spectacular economic growth...and that cannot be denied. Additionally, the fleeting decline happened not because of the New Deal’s spending programs, but because Roosevelt momentarily listened to know-nothings not unlike yourself, and backed off them. As Nobel Laureate Professor Paul Krugman notes, in 1937-38, FDR “was persuaded to balance the budget” and “cut spending and the economy went back down again.” To be sure, you can credibly argue that the New Deal had its share of problems...and knowing you as I do, you WILL. But overall, the numbers prove it helped—rather than hurt—the macro-economy. “Excepting 1937-1938, unemployment fell each year of Roosevelt’s first two terms [while] the U.S. economy grew at average annual growth rates of 9 percent to 10 percent,” writes University of California historian Eric Rauchway. Are you prepared to argue with that? Further, the New Deal’s most "massive government intervention," its financial regulations, did NOT prolong the Great Depression either. According to Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, “Only with the New Deal’s rehabilitation of the financial system in 1933-35 did the economy begin its slow emergence from the Great Depression.” In fact, even famed conservative economist Milton Friedman admitted that the New Deal’s Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. was “the structural change most conducive to monetary stability since ... the Civil War.” Oops! Okay. All the verifiable evidence proves the New Deal did not prolong the Depression...and historians CONFIRM IT. As Newsweek’s Daniel Gross reports, “One would be very hard-pressed to find a serious professional historian who believes that the New Deal prolonged the Depression.” How does it feel being wrong about EVERYTHING?? As rightwing loony tunes try to obstruct a new New Deal, they’re not making any arguments that are remotely serious...are they? I'd strongly suggest you quit while you're behind...
__________________
Last edited by Angel Of Mercy : 01-04-2009 at 12:32 AM. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
I get really sick of these rightwad liars spreading ugly propaganda in here, Affrayer, and I'm serving notice as of now: Smackdowns WILL be administered as required!
(Glad you liked it...)
__________________
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
If you persist in insulting members here, "smackdowns" will be issued. You are skirting the line. Debate the issues without casting aspersions on posters who don't share your opinion.
__________________
![]() "When the people fear their government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty." Thomas Jefferson Walter Mondale: "George Bush doesn't have the manhood to apologize." George Bush: "Well, on the manhood thing, I'll put mine up against his any time."
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|