|
Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site! |
|
||||||
| American Politics This is the main forum of political fever. This forum can be used for anything political, from the 08 election to the war in Iraq! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
I wonder if there is a real difference in total tax pressure between the Republicans and the Democrats, considering the much larger amount of militairy spending the Republicans seem to do. On top of that, the current tax plan isn't even responsible, because even up till now the American national debt is rising steadily.
|
|
|||
|
Perhaps you are right on this. The way I see it, the Mexican model may also be a possibility as there is little or no middle class there. Just elites and poverty.
__________________
No party holds the privilege of dictating to me how I shall vote. If loyalty to party is a form of patriotism, I am no patriot. If there is any valuable difference between a monarchist and an American, it lies in the theory that the American can decide for himself what is patriotic and what isn't. I claim that difference. I am the only person in the sixty millions that is privileged to dictate my patriotism. - Mark Twain, a Biography |
|
||||
|
Quote:
BTW..."This is stupid" is not really an answer. Quote:
In other words, a girl get's knocked up and the fix all solution is an abortion? Is life that disposable for your generation?
__________________
___________________ ![]() A picture is worth a thousand words. Wish Barack H. Obama good luck on 1/20/2009 (202) 456-1414 Inauguration Day Events |
|
||||
|
How about parents teaching some better values and morals to the kids as well as accountability for their actions. My analogy of the day: Most people will limit the amount of tissue they stick in the toilet, rather than expecting roto-rooter to come around everytime they clog it up.
|
|
||||
|
Condescending BS there Chosen 1.
We do not have trickle down economics, we have trickle OUT economics. Billionaires are moving offices and factories overseas so they do not have to pay taxes on their profits. Then they bank those profits offshore. Added together with outsourcing jobs, this represents TRICKLE OUT economics. All of the above supports the infrastructure of foreign countries, not the American infrastructure that was the basis for these sociopathic slobs to get rich. In short, economic treason. Those jobs and that money goes to support the infrastructure of other countries where they can set up sweat shops a less than minimum wage with no workmans compensation, medical coverage or everything else. The billionaire CEO and multi millionaire executive staff members here are driving around in stretch limos, many living off of bail out money while families are defaulting on mortgages and going homeless. |
|
||||
|
And that is so WRONG that I don't understand how anyone can believe that's OK.
__________________
![]() "When the people fear their government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty." Thomas Jefferson Walter Mondale: "George Bush doesn't have the manhood to apologize." George Bush: "Well, on the manhood thing, I'll put mine up against his any time."
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
"Gross" refers to corporate income, the tax rate on which is 35%. Obama isn't changing that 35% rate, but he is getting rid of it completely for businesses making less than $250,000. "This is stupid" is a perfectly good answer. It's moronic (equally good answer). Obama's tax plan refers to individual incomes. According to The Tax Foundation (The Tax Foundation - Candidates 2008), Obama's plan will maintain the 10% tax on incomes less than $8,025 (married $16,050), maintain the 15% tax on incomes of $8,025-$32,550 (married $16,050-$65,100), maintain the 25% tax on incomes of $32,550 - $78,850 (married $65,100 - $131,450), and maintain the 28% tax on incomes of $78,850 - $164,550 (married $131,450 - $200,300). Now, that's obviously not a perfect system. I think, if I had to keep the same brackets, I would say 1%, 5%, 10%, 20%, and 30%. Here's where Obama's plan differs from the current rates: he would allow the rate of 33% on incomes of $164,550 - $357,700 (married $200,300 - $357,700) to expire to 36%, and rate on incomes of over $357,000 (single and married) would expire from 35% to 39.6%. So, in all, this is a total increase of 3% for the second-highest income bracket, and 4.9% for the highest bracket. And all this fuss over that? You really are a laugh. Quote:
Current bracket of $357,000+ becomes $357,000-$500,000. Rate stays the same. Next bracket, $500,000-$1 million. Tax rate, 40%. $1-$3 million: tax rate 45%. $3-25 million: tax rate, 48%. $25-100 million: tax rate, 50%. $100 million-$1 billion: tax rate, 60%. $1 billion and over: tax rate, 75%. Quote:
Quote:
Don't act like it's "my generation" that's immature and is cheapening life. You're cheapening life by making it into something that can be ruined completely by a single bad choice. If the means exists to fix the consequences of your wrong decision, you don't sit in the corner and "live with the consequences." You try to make amends and fix your mistakes. By your logic there wouldn't be erasers on pencils. After all, if you don't want to have a paper with a bunch of spelling mistakes on it, don't make them in the first place, right?
__________________
"Moreover, I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states...Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial "outside agitator" idea. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds." ~Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Last edited by Zephyr : 11-06-2008 at 01:32 AM. |
|
||||
|
I find it hilarious how people get all emotionally uptight about aborting mindless fetuses, but they often think nothing of slaughtering much more self-aware non-human animals because they "taste good." The doublethink is stupendous. Mindless machine = precious life, but non-human animals = do whatever you feel like to it if it makes you happy.
I really don't give a crap about women aborting early fetuses. It's nothing more than a mindless biomachine at that point. it can't think, it can't feel. It's like getting all emotional about your laptop. I find it worse to kill a chimp. If you think that makes life cheap, whatever. I think Americans have cheapened "life" given the vast overeating of meat from animals that suffer far, far worse than your precious little meatpuppet fetus.
__________________
Last edited by Technocratic_Utilitarian : 11-06-2008 at 01:31 AM. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"Moreover, I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states...Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial "outside agitator" idea. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds." ~Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|