Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site!

Go Back   Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums > Political Central > American Politics

American Politics This is the main forum of political fever. This forum can be used for anything political, from the 08 election to the war in Iraq!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2008, 09:21 AM
Finny's Avatar
Politically Incorrect
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Userid: 263
Location: Columbus,OH
Posts: 2,888
Rep Power: 3
Finny is on a distinguished road
Default How to do a Windfall profit tax but it not be one..

I am going to use logic and reality here.. There will be no dogma bs that many here live by. So before any Democrats (Liberals) or Republicans (Conservatives) here decide this doesn't make sense.. think outside of the box.


Most here know a Windfall profit tax was used in the early 1980's and it failed to bring in extra taxes or curb profits on the Oil Industry as the Oil Industry is based on consumption. So a Direct Profit tax fails. So that idea should be taken out back and shot like ol' Yeller.

But what hasn't been tried is something I've argued for a while back (a Consumption tax). This would end Income Taxes, but still be a "progressive" tax that Democrats love so much. But at the same time Republicans can be happy due to allows choice (meaning you can choose to consume or not consume more then you need). It would also over haul our flawed tax system.

So with this idea, I am thinking of a 15 to 20% tax on products. Be it bought or sold. This would effect Oil Companies as they buy Oil to produce Gas and so on.

Rich folk would pay more as they usually consume more then poor folk. So it would not be a regressive tax towards the poor as the basics would not be taxed (Food, Medicine, and Housing).. It would not exclude anyone from Property tax as that is a local tax and not Federally done.

But to do this spending has to be kept in check as it relies on the Economy and Consumerism to fuel it. When the Economy slows (like now) the Federal Government would have to slim the budget. Which leads to better spending by the Government as it will require planning. None of this willy nilly crap we've been doing since 1913.

Liberals should like this idea as its a way of "leveling" the playing field.
__________________
Pioneers are walking all around singing songs about Lenin and they should be shot for it.

Handlebars

"If you are looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror"- V

It is inaccurate to say that I hate everything. I am strongly in favor of common sense, common honesty, and common decency. This makes me forever ineligible for public office.
H. L. Mencken

come on you know you wanna play football..

Beagán agus a rá go maith.

Economic Left/Right: 3.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.87

Last edited by Finny : 08-04-2008 at 09:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2008, 09:34 AM
Chan's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 133
Location: Buffalo, New York, USA
Posts: 5,775
Rep Power: 8
Chan has a spectacular aura aboutChan has a spectacular aura about
Default

It sounds like you're proposing a simple national sales tax, which sounds reasonable in theory; but you know that the federal government likes to use the carrot of tax breaks or the threat of increased taxation to manipulate behavior. You'd also be taking away a favorite Democrat mantra of making the rich pay more taxes (or accusing the Republicans of tax cuts to favor the rich).

LIBERALS DON'T WANT TO LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD!!!! They want to push on us something that was never supposed to actually exist in the United States: class warfare. They want the poor and middle class to be jealous of the rich and to resent the rich. They want people to think they're sticking it to the rich to benefit everyone else. They want to perpetuate the union rats' mantra about how business owners are making obscene amounts of money and that they should be forced to share it with the workers.
__________________
A panda walks into a cafe. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and fires two shots in the air.

"Why?" asks the confused waiter, as the panda makes toward the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder.

"I'm a panda," he says at the door. "Look it up."

The waiter turns to the relevant entry and, sure enough, finds an explanation.

"Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves."

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2008, 11:11 AM
xjoe3x's Avatar
Serae dubbs thee poo bear
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 206
Age: 21
Posts: 7,229
Rep Power: 9
xjoe3x has a spectacular aura about
Default

It is a national sales tax, if we were to do a sales tax I would prefer the fair tax plan to a simple sales tax.
__________________
May your paradise always be green, you liberties always be full, and may the ignorance of you enemies not drive you to be pro-nuke.

"We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself
into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and
trying to lift himself up by the handle."-Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2008, 12:27 PM
malrenalds's Avatar
Advisor
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 73
Location: Springfield
Posts: 3,066
Rep Power: 6
malrenalds is a jewel in the roughmalrenalds is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
So with this idea, I am thinking of a 15 to 20% tax on products. Be it bought or sold. This would effect Oil Companies as they buy Oil to produce Gas and so on.
Most buy it from themselves they would easily be able to cut the pretend seller out and save money .

other then that concern I would be willing to look in to this. It may be better then the fair tax cult.
__________________
===Quote of the day===
"The enemy of my enemy, can kiss my a$$ too."
Lilah from 'Angel'

Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2008, 12:34 PM
GeneCosta's Avatar
Left-libertarian
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Userid: 334
Posts: 796
Rep Power: 1
GeneCosta will become famous soon enough
Default

This is a worse suggestion than the FairTax, which already placed more demands on the bottom 50% of all income earners. I might add any tax system can be abused.

Quote:
LIBERALS DON'T WANT TO LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD!!!! They want to push on us something that was never supposed to actually exist in the United States: class warfare. They want the poor and middle class to be jealous of the rich and to resent the rich. They want people to think they're sticking it to the rich to benefit everyone else. They want to perpetuate the union rats' mantra about how business owners are making obscene amounts of money and that they should be forced to share it with the workers.
Because the rich derive their wealth from state assistance in the form of unqualified property "rights," tax loopholes, and subsidization. Class warfare does exist. Ever since there were classes to talk about, there has been conflict between them. It's a fact of history.
__________________


Defeating market theocrats since 2001.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2008, 12:34 PM
xjoe3x's Avatar
Serae dubbs thee poo bear
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 206
Age: 21
Posts: 7,229
Rep Power: 9
xjoe3x has a spectacular aura about
Default

Cult?
__________________
May your paradise always be green, you liberties always be full, and may the ignorance of you enemies not drive you to be pro-nuke.

"We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself
into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and
trying to lift himself up by the handle."-Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2008, 12:35 PM
xjoe3x's Avatar
Serae dubbs thee poo bear
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 206
Age: 21
Posts: 7,229
Rep Power: 9
xjoe3x has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeneCosta View Post
This is a worse suggestion than the FairTax, which already placed more demands on the bottom 50% of all income earners. I might add any tax system can be abused.
Actually the fairtax is quite progressive and would help the poor more than any other class.
__________________
May your paradise always be green, you liberties always be full, and may the ignorance of you enemies not drive you to be pro-nuke.

"We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself
into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and
trying to lift himself up by the handle."-Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2008, 12:37 PM
GeneCosta's Avatar
Left-libertarian
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Userid: 334
Posts: 796
Rep Power: 1
GeneCosta will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xjoe3x View Post
Actually the fairtax is quite progressive and would help the poor more than any other class.
Doubtful, but I don't want to sidetrack Finny's thread.
__________________


Defeating market theocrats since 2001.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2008, 12:37 PM
xjoe3x's Avatar
Serae dubbs thee poo bear
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 206
Age: 21
Posts: 7,229
Rep Power: 9
xjoe3x has a spectacular aura about
Default

Oh and if you are going to exempt you will have to have a higher percentage than 15-20% at least to have the same income as the current taxes.
__________________
May your paradise always be green, you liberties always be full, and may the ignorance of you enemies not drive you to be pro-nuke.

"We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself
into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and
trying to lift himself up by the handle."-Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2008, 12:45 PM
Oregon Elephant's Avatar
prrrrr.....
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 63
Age: 21
Posts: 7,751
Rep Power: 10
Oregon Elephant has a spectacular aura aboutOregon Elephant has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finny View Post
I am going to use logic and reality here.. There will be no dogma bs that many here live by. So before any Democrats (Liberals) or Republicans (Conservatives) here decide this doesn't make sense.. think outside of the box.


Most here know a Windfall profit tax was used in the early 1980's and it failed to bring in extra taxes or curb profits on the Oil Industry as the Oil Industry is based on consumption. So a Direct Profit tax fails. So that idea should be taken out back and shot like ol' Yeller.

But what hasn't been tried is something I've argued for a while back (a Consumption tax). This would end Income Taxes, but still be a "progressive" tax that Democrats love so much. But at the same time Republicans can be happy due to allows choice (meaning you can choose to consume or not consume more then you need). It would also over haul our flawed tax system.

So with this idea, I am thinking of a 15 to 20% tax on products. Be it bought or sold. This would effect Oil Companies as they buy Oil to produce Gas and so on.

Rich folk would pay more as they usually consume more then poor folk. So it would not be a regressive tax towards the poor as the basics would not be taxed (Food, Medicine, and Housing).. It would not exclude anyone from Property tax as that is a local tax and not Federally done.

But to do this spending has to be kept in check as it relies on the Economy and Consumerism to fuel it. When the Economy slows (like now) the Federal Government would have to slim the budget. Which leads to better spending by the Government as it will require planning. None of this willy nilly crap we've been doing since 1913.

Liberals should like this idea as its a way of "leveling" the playing field.
I'm going to disagree. If the oil companies have to pay 15-20% on the oil they buy, then privately owned gas stations are going to also be paying another 15-20% (as it is another transaction) to get the gas, and then you at the pump will be paying another 15-20% (yet another transaction), so when it gets to you, you'll be paying 45-60% in taxes. That will devistate the lower and middle class.

The samething will happen to food, and anything else if the government takes taxes at each transaction.

Also, a consumption tax discourages spending, which is what they say drives our economy.
__________________
Set your destination with your heart, get there with your mind.

"The wisest men follow their own direction." - Euripides
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On






     Top Political Sites  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 PM.
Political Fever 2007/2008
   Word Search   |   Family Friendly   |   AdSense Forum   |   Game Cheats   |   Coupon Codes   |   Spore Game   |   Xcode Forum   |   Political Forums   |   Internet Marketing   |   Social Networking    |   Sudoku   |   Mobile Marketing   |   Web Forms   |   Articles & News   |   Loans & Credit Repair   |   Online Coupon Codes   |   Loans   |   Sudoku Puzzles   |   Map Games   |   Spore Screenshots   |   Acai Berry