Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site!

Go Back   Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums > Political Central > American Politics

American Politics This is the main forum of political fever. This forum can be used for anything political, from the 08 election to the war in Iraq!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2008, 12:29 AM
xjoe3x's Avatar
Serae dubbs thee poo bear
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 206
Age: 22
Posts: 7,289
Rep Power: 10
xjoe3x has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zephyr View Post
Lincoln was a progressive. The Republicans were the more progressive party until the 1930s.

In other words, they were "liberals."
The meaning of what is liberal and conservative changes over time.

Edit:
For clarification the actual meaning of them do not. They refer to change. Just what they stand for where does.
__________________
May your paradise always be green, you liberties always be full, and may the ignorance of you enemies not drive you to be pro-nuke.

"We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself
into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and
trying to lift himself up by the handle."-Winston Churchill

Last edited by xjoe3x : 07-20-2008 at 12:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2008, 12:32 AM
Zephyr's Avatar
Obama's Socialist Goon
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 58
Location: Wouldn't you like to know.
Age: 18
Posts: 4,645
Rep Power: 8
Zephyr is a jewel in the roughZephyr is a jewel in the rough
Default

Yes, but Lincoln was a progressive liberal. Progressive's definition has not changed over time.
__________________
"Moreover, I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states...Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial "outside agitator" idea. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds."



~Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2008, 12:49 AM
Affrayer's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Userid: 343
Posts: 4,116
Rep Power: 7
Affrayer will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zephyr View Post
Yes, but Lincoln was a progressive liberal. Progressive's definition has not changed over time.
Progressive liberal? Well let's just say it's hard to call him a conservative...

BTW: In his day, Lincoln was called a "black republican." Needless to say progressives and conservatives have changed positions so many time that neither may have standing on a historical basis.
The New Paradigm: New Conservative/Progressive re in Your World Now

The old paradigm was Liberal/Conservative. It was about moderation and compromise. The current White House changed a lot of things, one was to completely destroy that paradigm and raise the prominence of three different factions: the Neoconservatives, the New Conservatives, and the Progressives.

The unifying element in these groups is that none of them fit within the Liberal/Conservative framework. the Neoconservatives are demented far-left radicals who seek to bring about socialism by means of creating far-right fear-generators like extreme Corporate Militarism and Authoritarianism (with Fascism), the New Conservatives are moderates who honor traditional America and have found new value in that honoring (where before they took it for granted), and Progressives are seeking new solutions for building a new America.

Recognizing the instability and power vacuum that is now America, each of these groups is making their stand. The Neocons are well-known and don’t need to be mentioned. The New Conservatives form much of the American population and have champions in such public figures as Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert. Unlike the New Conservatives (who would like nothing more than a return to the Liberal/Conservative paradigm), Progressives see solutions in new projects, new conceptions and ideas for America. Progressives are more critical of liberals and conservatives and are more excited than the New Conservatives about this new system.
Let's just say that things change and as they do, who and what a conservative is and who and what a progressive is, changes with them...
__________________
I'm Proud I never Voted For Bush!



PAT PAULSEN FOR PRESIDENT
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2008, 01:30 AM
Newest Mod
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 103
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,009
Rep Power: 4
pjohns will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Liberal-hater View Post
In a recent speech at Brown University, lefty billionaire Ted Turner covered all the bases, claiming that “the world is on the brink of collapse” because of “threats of nuclear war, population explosion, and environmental exploitation.”
The middle part is downright Malthusian. In a broader sense, the rest could reasonably be described that way also; although alarmist would probably be a more accurate description.

Another poster mentioned the 2006 bestseller, America Alone (subtitled, The End of the World as We Know It), by Canadian author Mark Steyn. It is an enormously important volume, in my mind; so left-leaners may (correctly) accuse this conservative of believing that Europe is already practically doomed, and America is positioned on the precipice.

There is, however, a fundamental difference: Lefties believe either that all of humankind is to blame for our predicament, or, alternatively, that Western civilization is to blame. Whether the subject is overpopulation, famine, the threat of nuclear war, global warming, or...well, whatever, the left seems to believe that humans are interlopers on a planet that would be much healthier absent Homo Sapiens, and that Westerners are especially egregious offenders.

On the other hand, I believe--and I think I can fairly say, most other conservatives also believe--that the major threats in the twentieth century came from Nazism and communism; and that the principal threat that faces us in the early part of the twenty-first century is Islamofascism. The common thread here: totalitarian ideology. This is far different from the common thread that runs through the left's littany of perceived threats.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2008, 01:48 AM
Oregon Elephant's Avatar
prrrrr.....
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 63
Age: 22
Posts: 7,751
Rep Power: 11
Oregon Elephant has a spectacular aura aboutOregon Elephant has a spectacular aura about
Default

"Conservatives" have not changed positions, "republicans" have. For example, the social conservatives and religious right where strong voters for democrats before the party moved to another direction, of which they then became republicans.

The main groups in conservatism have shifted around of time, like from traditional small government conservatives to more social conservatives and neo-conservatives. So the face has changed, but what conservatism (or liberalism on the other hand) have not changed.
__________________
Set your destination with your heart, get there with your mind.

"The wisest men follow their own direction." - Euripides
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2008, 09:28 AM
Affrayer's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Userid: 343
Posts: 4,116
Rep Power: 7
Affrayer will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oregon Elephant View Post
"Conservatives" have not changed positions, "republicans" have.
Conservatives vote for republicans. They voted for Reagan, Bush 41, and Bush 43. All three ran on a conservative platform. They now back McCain't who they call a maverick because he sometimes strays from the conservative platform. Since Reagan, Bush 41, and Bush 43 all did the same thing, massive deficits, massive spending, superfluous wars, and McCain't is set to do the same, by there actions conservatives are republicans...

However why don't you entertain us, tell us when the conservatives haven't voted republican in the last 50 yeas....
__________________
I'm Proud I never Voted For Bush!



PAT PAULSEN FOR PRESIDENT
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2008, 10:54 AM
Michael's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 166
Location: Sierra Mountains
Posts: 7,501
Rep Power: 11
Michael has a spectacular aura aboutMichael has a spectacular aura about
Default

The full spectrum I see is traditional conservatives, neo conservatives, Christian conservatives, then you have Libertarians - many of whom hold traditional conservative beliefs, then you have moderates and independents in the middle, then you have mainline old school liberals, the more extemists liberals, and progressives. And somewhere in there is you old line traditional conservative Democrats in rural states.

Every time I see an article here declaring a good guys and bad guys situation, right wing and left wing or vice versa, I regaurd it as almost comic book style simplification.
__________________
National Debt =
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2008, 12:26 PM
xjoe3x's Avatar
Serae dubbs thee poo bear
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 206
Age: 22
Posts: 7,289
Rep Power: 10
xjoe3x has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Affrayer View Post
Conservatives vote for republicans. They voted for Reagan, Bush 41, and Bush 43. All three ran on a conservative platform. They now back McCain't who they call a maverick because he sometimes strays from the conservative platform. Since Reagan, Bush 41, and Bush 43 all did the same thing, massive deficits, massive spending, superfluous wars, and McCain't is set to do the same, by there actions conservatives are republicans...

However why don't you entertain us, tell us when the conservatives haven't voted republican in the last 50 yeas....
Yes all conservatives vote for republicans, that is almost accurate...
__________________
May your paradise always be green, you liberties always be full, and may the ignorance of you enemies not drive you to be pro-nuke.

"We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself
into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and
trying to lift himself up by the handle."-Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2008, 02:31 PM
Affrayer's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Userid: 343
Posts: 4,116
Rep Power: 7
Affrayer will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xjoe3x View Post
Yes all conservatives vote for republicans, that is almost accurate...
Is that prevarication? As a group it is more than just generally true that conservatives vote for republicans.
__________________
I'm Proud I never Voted For Bush!



PAT PAULSEN FOR PRESIDENT
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2008, 02:43 PM
xjoe3x's Avatar
Serae dubbs thee poo bear
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 206
Age: 22
Posts: 7,289
Rep Power: 10
xjoe3x has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Affrayer View Post
Is that prevarication? As a group it is more than just generally true that conservatives vote for republicans.
Well first off America does not contain everyone.

Second unfortunately we have a crappy two party system which people are stuck with crap or crap that does not really reflect their views.

Lastly just because the majority do something does not mean all do.
__________________
May your paradise always be green, you liberties always be full, and may the ignorance of you enemies not drive you to be pro-nuke.

"We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself
into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and
trying to lift himself up by the handle."-Winston Churchill
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On






     Top Political Sites  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:51 AM.
Political Fever 2007/2008
   Word Search   |   Family Friendly   |   AdSense Forum   |   Game Cheats   |   Coupon Codes   |   Spore Game   |   Xcode Forum   |   Political Forums   |   Internet Marketing   |   Social Networking    |   Sudoku   |   Mobile Marketing   |   Web Forms   |   Articles & News   |   Loans & Credit Repair   |   Online Coupon Codes   |   Loans   |   Sudoku Puzzles   |   Map Games   |   Spore Screenshots   |   Acai Berry