Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site!

Go Back   Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums > Political Central > American Politics

American Politics This is the main forum of political fever. This forum can be used for anything political, from the 08 election to the war in Iraq!

View Poll Results: Should open offshore areas to oil drilling?
Yes 7 50.00%
No 5 35.71%
Undecided 0 0%
Other (please explain) 2 14.29%
Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2008, 04:40 PM
Angel Of Mercy's Avatar
...NO mercy for fascists!
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Userid: 619
Location: East Heaven
Posts: 859
Rep Power: 2
Angel Of Mercy has a spectacular aura aboutAngel Of Mercy has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdzeye View Post
I agree. There's no evidence that opening up offshore drilling will bring any relief at the gas pump anytime in the near future. This is just a cynical ploy by Bush (to make it look like he's "doing something" about gas prices, even though it's not likely to help the consumer anytime soon) and the oil companies (who are taking advantage of the high prices - which are reflected in their record profits - to get their grubby hands on even more oil in the ground.

I'd like some assurances that the next time they spill oil into the environment, the response from the oil companies will be rapid and thorough, unlike their response to the Valdez incident.
You're exactly right, Birdz. ExxonMobil got completely off the hook on that one...
__________________
<img src=http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h110/landofshangrila/thInsaneBrain.png border=0 alt= />
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2008, 05:06 PM
Michael's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 166
Location: Sierra Mountains
Posts: 7,486
Rep Power: 10
Michael has a spectacular aura aboutMichael has a spectacular aura about
Default

Taxpayers paid for most of the clean up after the Valdeze oil spill while ExxonMobile tied up all of the lawsuits in court for 20 years. This is in the same time period when Lee Raymonds was getting very rich as CEO and the corporation starting posting the highest profits of any corporation in US history.

What's happening right now is a gimmick. Offshore drilling will have no relationship at all with decreasing the price of gas at the pumps within the near future. The oil corporations and their bought and paid for legislators want to use public anger at the pump to serve their own purposes.
__________________
National Debt =
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2008, 05:08 PM
AnnEsthesia's Avatar
100% Republican Stud
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 126
Location: Where good Christians sleep safe at night.
Age: 88
Posts: 1,551
Rep Power: 3
AnnEsthesia will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grim17 View Post
I have already made my opinion clear on this...

Drill Here... Drill Now... Pay Less.

Michael, wasn't it you that told me that we could only post a few paragraphs of a story? Or does that rule only apply to select sources, or certain posters? Could you please define the rules for me... Thank you.
Prove that drilling here will reduce prices. Why not just have them drill the sites they currently hold leases for and have not touched?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2008, 11:27 PM
FibrillatorD's Avatar
Citizen
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 216
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Age: 23
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 2
FibrillatorD is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grim17 View Post
I have already made my opinion clear on this...

Drill Here... Drill Now... Pay Less.
And an opinion is all it is. I invite you to dedicate a modicum of effort to learning the dynamics of a globally-traded commodity before spewing your own gas on the economics of the topic.

Can Offshore Drilling Bring Down Gas Prices? - Seeking Alpha

Some ballpark figures:

Quote:
we are looking at an incremental increase in domestic production of ~700 million barrels per year, on average. The U.S. is expected to consumer 7.45 billion barrels of oil in 2008, so 700 million represents about 9% of our consumption.

Given that world demand for oil is rising so much, the offshore oil we may be able to drill out of the ground would have little impact on gas prices because the oil market is a worldwide exchange. If we just had a U.S. oil market, then yes, it would have a decent impact, but that is simply not the case.

As a result, it is hard to see how more offshore drilling would impact gas prices at the pump in any measurable way. Even if world oil consumption was held constant, we could potentially increase global supply by about 2%. An equal drop in price would bring $4.09 gasoline down to $4.00 per gallon. It just does not help solve the real problem.

That said, it would certainly prevent our energy dollars from being shipped to the Middle Eastern oil-rich countries, so we could keep that money here. Of course, that means our oil companies in the U.S. will make even more money than they are right now, and people are already complaining about record profits for the energy industry even without offshore drilling.
A few critical aggravating factors this article does not account for: the trend of OPEC countries to move away from dollar holdings; plausible OPEC reactions to the prospect of a 2% bump in global oil production; the high likelihood that demand in the far east will continue to increase at a rapid and sustained rate.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2008, 11:36 PM
FibrillatorD's Avatar
Citizen
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 216
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Age: 23
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 2
FibrillatorD is on a distinguished road
Default

I'll also add that there is a trend among the nation's legislatures to assemble regional fossil fuel-reduction accords. Here in Minnesota, the governor (Tim Pawlenty (R) and top v.p. candidate - McCain's coming to MN tomorrow - watch for possible announcement) will be negotiating a Midwestern Regional Greenhouse Gas Reduction Accord with the legislative mandate to meet reductions of 80% by 2050.

This is a bold figure put together by last year's legislature dominated by DFLers ie. Democrats. But nationwide, trends clearly point to the more immediate and local efficacy of reducing consumption and demand versus increasing production.

Btw, is it not a conservative virtue to change one's own behavior before appealing to federal intervention for help with paying the bills?
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 12:27 AM
Zephyr's Avatar
Obama's Socialist Goon
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 58
Location: Wouldn't you like to know.
Age: 17
Posts: 4,611
Rep Power: 7
Zephyr is a jewel in the roughZephyr is a jewel in the rough
Default

No, Fibrillator, Grim's "opinions" are actually what mere mortals like us call "facts."

Sorry, but he's just on a plane so much higher than ours, it's useless to debate with his awesome clarity.
__________________
"Moreover, I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states...Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial "outside agitator" idea. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider anywhere within its bounds."



~Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 02:44 AM
Citizen
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Userid: 698
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Luningning is on a distinguished road
Default

The issues surrounding recent discussions on US offshore drilling for oil has significant impact for all Americans where Obama and McCain talk about in pollClash . The soaring oil prices are affecting the costs of everything from food to gas. There are also significant issues on local and global environmental impact. While there are many issues, we need to look at our next leader and determine which will have the best course of action going forward. Here's where your vote and voice can count. Watch the two video clips below submit your vote. Also, leave a comment if there is more you wish to say or an issue you think should be raised within the context of this clash.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 09:43 AM
Chan's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 133
Location: Buffalo, New York, USA
Posts: 5,775
Rep Power: 8
Chan has a spectacular aura aboutChan has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Space_Coyote View Post
Just like ten years ago, the DNC is stalling this issue because they're in the pocket of the Greenpeace idiots.

Just the NOTION of drilling offshore in America as a serious idea will drop global oil prices. What's more, until you can get the green idiots to allow nuclear energy and accept the fact that electric cars can't happen without nuclear, we'll need oil to power our country. Why buy it abroad when you can make it yourself? Do you think ranchers buy their steak at the grocery store?
So, why haven't gas prices dropped if just the notion of offshore drilling is supposed to drop global oil prices?
__________________
A panda walks into a cafe. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and fires two shots in the air.

"Why?" asks the confused waiter, as the panda makes toward the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder.

"I'm a panda," he says at the door. "Look it up."

The waiter turns to the relevant entry and, sure enough, finds an explanation.

"Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves."

Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 11:11 AM
Michael's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 166
Location: Sierra Mountains
Posts: 7,486
Rep Power: 10
Michael has a spectacular aura aboutMichael has a spectacular aura about
Default

How a Shady Citigroup Subsidiary Secretly Makes Billions in the Oil Market - Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums

Lumara has posted and excellent article about how money grubbing sociopath stock brokers have doubled the price of gas at the pumps. Let's take oil off the market for speculation and eliminate the middleman slobs from the process. Oil and gas are not just any other commodity. When the price on oil and gas goes up, this is the driving force behind a wide range of costs for goods and services increasing. There is a very direct link to inflation. The current substantial jump in inflation is pushing the working poor and the elderly on fixed incomes that have been barely making into not being able to survive on their income.
__________________
National Debt =
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2008, 11:27 AM
Oregon Elephant's Avatar
prrrrr.....
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 63
Age: 21
Posts: 7,751
Rep Power: 10
Oregon Elephant has a spectacular aura aboutOregon Elephant has a spectacular aura about
Default

I'm for off shore drilling as most of you probably know, but for nationalized, not privatized.

As for it only adding 2% to the global market, yeah, that is all it offers, but the mistake that was wrongly assumed was that the adding 2% would have a 1:1 ratio on the price. Oil is a nessisity and so it has very inelastic suppy and demand curves. That means that a 2% could have more like a 6% or a 16%. Compare, in 1998, gas was 1.03 in my area, now it is over 4x that cost, but the global demand is not up 4 fold. And also, there is no requirement that we have to sell it all on the global market. We can also look at the 700 million barrals a year would translate into $91 billion a year (if the price only fell 2%) that our country would be making rather than buying, and that would have a good impact on our dollar and our debt.
__________________
Set your destination with your heart, get there with your mind.

"The wisest men follow their own direction." - Euripides
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On






     Top Political Sites  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 PM.
Political Fever 2007/2008
   Word Search   |   Family Friendly   |   AdSense Forum   |   Game Cheats   |   Coupon Codes   |   Spore Game   |   Xcode Forum   |   Political Forums   |   Internet Marketing   |   Social Networking    |   Sudoku   |   Mobile Marketing   |   Web Forms   |   Articles & News   |   Loans & Credit Repair   |   Online Coupon Codes   |   Loans   |   Sudoku Puzzles   |   Map Games   |   Spore Screenshots   |   Acai Berry