Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site!

Go Back   Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums > Political Central > American Politics

American Politics This is the main forum of political fever. This forum can be used for anything political, from the 08 election to the war in Iraq!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2008, 02:52 PM
Space_Coyote's Avatar
cxxx[;;;;>
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Userid: 622
Posts: 1,411
Rep Power: 3
Space_Coyote is a jewel in the roughSpace_Coyote is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leviathon435 View Post
I see no problem in governments making laws for the good of its citizens, whether that be making certain drugs illegal or forcing people to wear seatbelts.
What if they were to ban homosexuality because it represented a moral lapse? Who decides what is and is not good for a society?
__________________
"Bring me that horizon".
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2008, 03:33 PM
leviathon435's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 147
Location: Nottingham, England
Age: 17
Posts: 7,118
Rep Power: 9
leviathon435 has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Space_Coyote View Post
What if they were to ban homosexuality because it represented a moral lapse? Who decides what is and is not good for a society?
The people, through elected representatives.
__________________
Trust me, I'm a socialist!

There's power in a factory,power in the land, power in the hand of the worker. But it all amounts to nothing if together we don't stand, there is power in a union.
The union forever defending our rights, down with the blackleg, workers unite. To our brothers and our sisters in many far off lands, there is power in a union.
Money speaks for money, the devil for his own. - Billy Bragg
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2008, 03:54 PM
Lumara's Avatar
Dubbed Queen Bee by Annie
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Userid: 26
Location: A holler in Tennessee
Posts: 5,739
Rep Power: 8
Lumara has a spectacular aura aboutLumara has a spectacular aura about
Default

But what if my elected representatives aren't representing me? What then? And who decides what is good for me? Shouldn't I be the one to decide that? I haven't willingly granted that right to another individual, let alone the state.
__________________


"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty." Thomas Jefferson

Walter Mondale: "George Bush doesn't have the manhood to apologize." George Bush: "Well, on the manhood thing, I'll put mine up against his any time."
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2008, 04:09 PM
Space_Coyote's Avatar
cxxx[;;;;>
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Userid: 622
Posts: 1,411
Rep Power: 3
Space_Coyote is a jewel in the roughSpace_Coyote is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leviathon435 View Post
The people, through elected representatives.
So do the people have a right to vote in segregation or the extreme measure of genocide?

"Democracy is two wolves and sheep voting on who to eat for dinner."
__________________
"Bring me that horizon".
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2008, 04:13 PM
Chan's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 133
Location: Buffalo, New York, USA
Posts: 5,775
Rep Power: 8
Chan has a spectacular aura aboutChan has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leviathon435 View Post
I see no problem in governments making laws for the good of its citizens, whether that be making certain drugs illegal or forcing people to wear seatbelts.
How far are you willing to let that go, Leviathon? What happens when something about you that you neither chose nor can change is rendered illegal for the good of the other citizens?
__________________
A panda walks into a cafe. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and fires two shots in the air.

"Why?" asks the confused waiter, as the panda makes toward the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder.

"I'm a panda," he says at the door. "Look it up."

The waiter turns to the relevant entry and, sure enough, finds an explanation.

"Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves."

Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2008, 04:20 PM
Obama Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Userid: 380
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,617
Rep Power: 3
mwillman will become famous soon enough
Default

I am of two minds when it comes to the police.

On one side I recognize the need and good work that is done by police every day.

On the other side I do think that years of only working with mostly the scum of the earth
does create a bad mind set in many police and that in turn creates a lot of the problems.

Its a hard balance and it leads to a lot of issues but I don't see anyway other then to continue to attempt to learn from those mistakes. No police really isn't a good option so what we have now as bad as it can be is really the best option. That doesn't mean we shouldn't be on constant vigil for abuses of power and bad group think patterns. It doesn't mean we shouldn't keep trying to find a better system for policing our society.

We need to fix the problems with our legal system in general the police are just one aspect of a much bigger problem.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2008, 05:55 PM
leviathon435's Avatar
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 147
Location: Nottingham, England
Age: 17
Posts: 7,118
Rep Power: 9
leviathon435 has a spectacular aura about
Default

To Chan, Space and Lumara: I fully realise what you're saying, but the point of democracy is that we confer power to the people, who give it out as they wish to representatives, we may not like the results but I don't think democracy is wrong. We can make rules about human rights that no governmnet can break, or even have a written constitution, but I think the government should be allowed to protect its citizens even if that is from their own stupidity. Just because I believe this does not however mean I agree with any or all of the actions of any government necessarily, I can have views on what the government should do with its power.
__________________
Trust me, I'm a socialist!

There's power in a factory,power in the land, power in the hand of the worker. But it all amounts to nothing if together we don't stand, there is power in a union.
The union forever defending our rights, down with the blackleg, workers unite. To our brothers and our sisters in many far off lands, there is power in a union.
Money speaks for money, the devil for his own. - Billy Bragg
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2008, 06:06 PM
Congressman
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Userid: 449
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,307
Rep Power: 2
diuretic will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheSouth View Post
Seat belts laws have nothing to do with safety. They were created to generate another revenue stream for the government.
Wrong. The statistics tell the tale. They make driving safer. If legislatures want to generate more money they just up the ante - and they do.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2008, 06:07 PM
Congressman
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Userid: 449
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,307
Rep Power: 2
diuretic will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lumara View Post
Exactly. Just like speeding ticket quotas. Another source of revenue. If law enforcement personnel would concentrate on fighting actual crimes like murder, assault, and theft, rather than hassling citizens for revenue, this country would be a lot more free.
And if citizens would stop murdering and assaulting each other and stealing each other's property the cops could do more traffic work
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2008, 06:09 PM
Congressman
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Userid: 449
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,307
Rep Power: 2
diuretic will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Space_Coyote View Post
I remember once in college learning about the Japanese system of law enforcement, and how their police departments are far LESS militarized than Europe and America, and yet they have lower crime. I don't know that this is causation, but it's interesting nonetheless.

I recognize the need for specialized police units, some situations are beyond the capabilities of normal police training (like North Hollywood for example). But issuing patrol officers quick-release thigh-holsters, tactical gear, and automatic weapons in lieu of shotguns (the latter of which is actually more useful, but looks less imposing) is simply ridiculous. I was driving in Philadelphia once and saw a motorcycle cop with an MP5 on his bike, A SUBMACHINE GUN. Why? What possible use would that be to a motorcycle cop who writes tickets all day, has a radio, and oh yeah, already has a sidearm that fires the same caliber ammunition (as well as 45 rounds of ammunition).

Our police force needs to return the days where cops wore professional (but still practical) uniforms, worked to create stronger communities instead of simply scaring people into compliance, and for the love of god take away the tasers (they just make the cop more prone to use force when speech can work).
On Japan - they have immensely powerful agencies of social control beyond the police. The criminal justice system is very harsh by western standards.

I agree with you about the automatic weapons. Not necessary for general duties police and certainly not for the traffic cop on the motorcycle. I think it's a sign that militarism isn't just an official policy, I suspect it's strong in the informal culture as well.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On






     Top Political Sites  
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 PM.
Political Fever 2007/2008
   Word Search   |   Family Friendly   |   AdSense Forum   |   Game Cheats   |   Coupon Codes   |   Spore Game   |   Xcode Forum   |   Political Forums   |   Internet Marketing   |   Social Networking    |   Sudoku   |   Mobile Marketing   |   Web Forms   |   Articles & News   |   Loans & Credit Repair   |   Online Coupon Codes   |   Loans   |   Sudoku Puzzles   |   Map Games   |   Spore Screenshots   |   Acai Berry