|
Welcome to Political Fever - The Political Debate Forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest with limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. You can also take part in our Private Debates where you can test your skills against an opponent. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. After you Register the advertisements will disappear on the site! |
|
||||||
| American Politics This is the main forum of political fever. This forum can be used for anything political, from the 08 election to the war in Iraq! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Then "Greed" has a liberal tilt.
|
|
||||
|
Your way of interpretting what you read is totally partisan.
It is irregaurdless of right or left slant. No, I am saying whatever the slant is, they will go with what will sell newspapers and increase viewership on TV and the internet. If one news source out pooper scoops the others, then the other news sources will emulate them.
__________________
National Debt =
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
How much of Obamas coverage was the same reverend Wright clip looped? Or Clinton in Bosnia. Where was the liberal Bias when Bill Clinton's Total Acquittal in White Water appeared on page 4 of the new York times, while the cover had three story's about Lewinsky? There is only one master to major news organizations, and that is the bottom line. And John McCain is boring old news.
__________________
===Quote of the day===
"The enemy of my enemy, can kiss my a$$ too." Lilah from 'Angel' |
|
||||
|
Sorry, I missed the law that said being a Kennedy was illegal (or made one a crook), Kennedy is a far more likeble person than Nixon and would naturally have better reviews. but if you don't like him as the example, we could replace it with (who you think was the best president) compared to (who you think was the worst president), the point still stands that just because they don't present 50% positive and 50% negative on each candidate, doesn't make them bais.
__________________
Set your destination with your heart, get there with your mind. "The wisest men follow their own direction." - Euripides |
|
||||
|
__________________
Do not do to others what angers you if done to you by others. ~~Socrates ![]() My UPDATED Pep Talk For Lefties and Lurkers |
|
||||
|
Excellent point, Birdz... and obtw, don't forget Enron...
__________________
Do not do to others what angers you if done to you by others. ~~Socrates ![]() My UPDATED Pep Talk For Lefties and Lurkers |
|
||||
|
Measuring bias by looking at who gets more positive review is stupid anyway, given it's childish to assume "fair and balanced" must equate with both equal time and neutrality. If someone's an idiot, he deserves to get unfair, bad marks. If he's not, he doesn't deserve to be treated neutrally as if he's no different.
__________________
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|