Quote:
Originally Posted by AmericanDreamer
Tell us Levi, why do you think this article is "pro-christian propaganda" and the equivalent of "used toilet paper"? I am curious to hear your logic.
|
Ok, let's look at the very first part of it:
Quote:
|
The Bible often falls under careful scrutiny; almost every verse is challenged for authenticity, archaeological cross verification and contradictions (to which it has not yet fallen victim)
|
LIE Christian propoganda
I could run through the whole essay and bring out things like its attack of Islam for not wanting to portray their prophet (PBUH) being more proof of its usefullness being equivalent to that of used toilet paper. I could also run through the rest of the posted article and pull out all the crap (an apt word given the comparison I'm making) or i could just tell you the titles of some other articles posted by the author on "Associated Content" which include:
The Liberal Stranglehold on the English Language
Captured Al-Qaeda Document Reveals Egyptian Born Leader's Status
AC First Look: Multinational Force in Iraq Blasts Back at Al-Qaeda Number 2
Did You Know Terrorists Don't Care What We Do to Our Freedoms?
Religion is Not Required for Morality, but Why Are Atheists so Gosh Darn Amoral?
What Has the Israel-Palestinian Issue Taught Us About the U.N.? Don't Bother Playing by the Rules
Citizens, Ex-Muslims & More React to Organization of the Islamic Conference
You know what? There are even more articles that prove this author is just a biased right-wing Christian with very little thought for the other points of view.
But you'll just ignore this anyway and complain about me being a biased mod so I don't know why I bother.