View Single Post
  #79 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2008, 02:00 AM
Finny's Avatar
Finny Finny is offline
Politically Incorrect
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Userid: 263
Location: Columbus,OH
Posts: 2,888
Rep Power: 3
Finny is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skerlnik View Post
That's the biggest philisophical difference, I have noticed on this and other political forums/discussions, I've encountered.

Where some see things with a liberty/freedom/rights viewpoint, I tend to see things from a responsibility/accountability one. In my experience, the ones who are the most vocal about the loss of rights or restrictions on freedoms tend to be the ones who feel the least connection to society, desiring to operate solely on their own.

I admire the independent spirit, yet I start to worry that we've become less a society than a motley collection of 350 million self-centered individuals with no responsibiities for the collective nation as a whole. It frightens me a little that so many dislike the poor and disadavantaged so much as to feel anger towards even the most basic and inadequate social programs, because it means they have to share, give back to the country.

"Me-me-me, mine-mine-mine" appears to be the heart of that philosophy, and I think that's a poor national motto. That seems to be the core argument for abandoning to public school system to rot, for resistance to a health care system, for railing against a taxation system, and a government that ultimately provides far more benefit than what we pay into it (just not directly).

I think people of a "libertarian" opinion need to remember what the whole point to society is, why people began banding together into villages in the first place. It's more efficient and powerful to do somethings collectively than individually. You are beholden to insure the well-being of others. When people slip through the cracks, fail to financially function well in society, or drop out of education, everybody loses.

With rights come responsibilities, and you can't claim one without acknowledging that. You've got to earn those rights, nothing's free. We cannot continue to enjoy the high acheivements of our society if we figuratively turn tribal.

All that said, I am not some kumbiya socialist, but I do think certain core things need to be handled by government independent of volatile market forces. Education, health care and national defense come to mind. Government should be more of a referee, insuring fair play and competitiveness, protecting and bolstering the weak, for the good of the whole.

Selfishness has never been an American value, and I am ashamed and surprised when I encounter it.
So having a movement towards self Responsibilities instead of dictated Responsibility is bad? Is it not the goal to have a society which liberty/freedom/rights are at the forefront? But to do that the individual has to except the Responsibility for their actions. Which is the center platform to any Libertarian. To succeed, each person has to respect each other based on merits. It can not be forced by Governmental Laws.
__________________
Pioneers are walking all around singing songs about Lenin and they should be shot for it.

Handlebars

"If you are looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror"- V

It is inaccurate to say that I hate everything. I am strongly in favor of common sense, common honesty, and common decency. This makes me forever ineligible for public office.
H. L. Mencken

come on you know you wanna play football..

Beagán agus a rá go maith.

Economic Left/Right: 3.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.87
Reply With Quote