View Single Post
  #72 (permalink)  
Old 12-22-2007, 06:58 PM
magicmaester's Avatar
magicmaester magicmaester is offline
Congressman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 96
Location: Maine, USA
Age: 17
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 2
magicmaester is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by debateman View Post
I think that state recognizing marriage, originally a religious institution, as marriage is a violation of the separation between church and state. The state is essentially taking religious institutions and making them part of the states' operations. Only by removing the word marriage from the law will we achieve the balance between church and state we should seek. Keeping the word marriage in the law allows the pendulum to swing too far yet again. The pendulum swung too far by allowing marriage to become part of the legal system, but now it's swinging too far by the legal system redefining it. The religions should have the right to any special designation they want to give. The state should not.
Again, Marriage wasn't orginally a religious, or at least certainly not christian institution! There was marriage in Rome when everyone was pagan.
__________________
"I may not agree with what you have to say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -Voltaire

"All men are born with a nose and ten fingers, but no one was born with a knowledge of God." -Voltaire

"All murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets." -Voltaire

"Fear follows crime and is its punishment." -You guessed it, Voltaire.
Reply With Quote