View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2008, 11:36 PM
UShaditComing UShaditComing is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Userid: 489
Posts: 630
Rep Power: 0
UShaditComing is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnvs View Post
You know, I used to respect Ben Stein. Just as I used to respect C.S. Lewis. These two are equals in my mind - excellent examples of intelligent men who have fallen to unintelligent ideas. Basically, logic applies to all aspects of their thinking, but they randomly decide to make a "God box" that's immune to rational analysis. Every other opinion or concept may be reevaluated or updated, even replaced, but this one idea cannot budge.

It is very likely that Ben Stein was raised in religion and simply held onto it. C.S. Lewis apparently took a "journey" through all the religions and ended up choosing Christianity, which Christians use as testimonial evidence of why their religion is better than all the others.

As I said, I do respect these men for the things they do know, but I say this with moderation. For to say that one is well educated in theology or that one knows a lot about the Bible or religious thinking is the same thing as saying that someone is a GENIUS when it comes to Harry Potter. Sure, that's knowledge, but...

Ben Stein has a good point, though. The scientific community has been very asinine in squelching Creationist theory. Come on, have an open mind! I told members of a scientific convention that I believe storms happen when Zeus gets angry with mortals. They laughed me out of the room! In this day and age, our academic community needs fresh ideas. What better way to get them than from the doctrine of a 2,000 year old religion?
Good post but it's simply a matter of going with the IDers or not. If you decide to go with them you're going to get a licking and if you know anything about what happened in the Dover lawsuit and what was said then you will know that's the truth.

In a nutshell, which you may already know, ID is a sick combination of religion and science which relies on science to make it's points. They made a big mistake trying to go head to head with science in science's ballpark.

It's a rout!
Reply With Quote