Quote:
Originally Posted by spacecowboy
Lets not forget my all time favorites, “coffee and cigarettes.”
You know, for that thing inside our own device.
|
That was completely random and has no relevance to what I said.
Quote:
|
There are no other constants occurring that would result in such a thing. A random universe wouldn’t even have constant physical laws to have formed in the first place, it would be a real b_tch. Yesterdays tomorrows and today’s last years while up and down occur at the same time and sh_t.
|
Uhm... no. You're taking the "random" concept beyond what it's defined as. Nice try with the rhetoric, though.
Quote:
|
Are you looking at what your saying while remembering there’s no direction for it to know how to do this or even that it needs to?
|
Uh, yeah. Just because there's no intelligent being or man in the sky directing it doesn't mean that it is completely random. Random occurrences happening within a set of universal laws. Why are those the way they are? Hell if I know. Ask your god or ask Mr. Hawking, doesn't matter to me. That's not what we're debating.
Quote:
Whats not to get, anyone can make up a theory and prove it.
Lets see, I propose that photons are a byproduct of light and not light itself.
Hey, a few grants and a life’s work... 
|
Wrong. That's not a theory, that's a hypothesis. A hypothesis is a proposed idea for why something is the way it is. What you do next is go and test your hypothesis to see if it holds up under experimentation. Hell, maybe see if you can get yourself 30 minutes of time at the Fermi Collider. It's an interesting hypothesis.
A theory is something that's been at least partly proven and established. Evolution is fully proven. The Big Bang is partly proven. Relativity is fully proven. Quantum Mechanics is fully proven. Intelligent Design is not.