I only had time to watch the first part about radiation in space. I'll watch the rest later.
All he's doing is parroting the official government version of how dangerous space radiation is. The government lies all the time so that isn't conclusive proof.
Here's some stuff I found on the internet about space radiation. Of course I'm not in a position to know for sure which version reflects reality; the only people who know the truth are people with high security clearances in governments who send probes into space.
http://www.geocities.com/apollotruth/
(excerpt)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is an old saying that "A liar needs a good memory". Nowhere is this more true than in the Apollo program. NASA tell lies to cover up previous lies, and other discrepancies uncovered by people investigating the Moon landings. Altering previous data, removing photographs, and retracting statements made, only re-enforces the evidence that NASA are on the run, and being forced into a corner to which they cannot escape. The actions of those under investigation makes the investigator more aware they are bluffing. The longer that person, or persons, who make the extravagant claims continue, the more lies they have to tell in order to counteract it, until it reaches the point where it becomes ridiculous. That point was passed in July 1999, when NASA officials were questioned about the Moon landings on television. They dodged the all important questions like a drifter dodges the heat.
Many Apollo astronauts have long since died, as to have many of the original NASA officials involved in the scam, consequently current officials, who know that Apollo was a fake, have not quite got it right when talking openly in public. Perhaps the biggest slip of the tongue was made by NASA Chief Dan Goldin when interviewed by UK TV journalist Sheena McDonald in 1994. He said that mankind cannot venture beyond Earth orbit, 250 miles into space, until they can find a way to overcome the dangers of cosmic radiation. He must have forgot that they supposedly sent 27 astronauts 250,000 miles outside Earth orbit 36 years earlier.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vENebR5hsRs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZ65d30kYME
two sets of radiation data
http://hey_223.tripod.com/bulldogleb...oooo/id82.html
(excerpt)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To prove his thesis, Rene tries to get certain solar data from NATIONAL
OCEANIC & ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, (NOAA) using clever techniques
to
disguise his true intentions, [i.e. to get true data on solar flares.] NOAA,
unfortunately, proved to be as cagey as Rene in dodging the giving out of any
really good DETAILS on this matter, [you know, where the devil resides.]
Rene, seeing games being played, deduced that there must be two sets of data,
one which is sent to scientists on the preferred list, and one sent to the
likes of Rene as casual strangers. (p.125)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://ocii.com/~dpwozney/apollo5.htm
http://www.erichufschmid.net/MoreInf...Challenge.html
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/in...9659&hl=apollo
Here is some evidence that the US government lies about science.
There are lots of cases of the official version of things being contested by reputable people in the alternative press.
Look at what this report on DU by RAND says.
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/l...9_bt170-99.htm
There were probably a few PH.D's working on it.
This woman has a PH.D.
http://video.google.es/videoplay?doc...86402266517406
She holds the opposite view.
Look at what this person says about "Genetically modified foods".
http://www.projectcensored.org/censo...7/index.htm#11
Look at this.
http://www.rand.org/commentary/051204FT.html
This woman talks about how a lot of the science community has sold out.
GLOBAL NUCLEAR COVER UP part #1
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...98989248030643
(around the 30 minute mark)
GLOBAL NUCLEAR COVER UP part #2
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...32617120640846
If the government lies about other aspects of science, why can't it lie about radiation levels in space?
What do you think of what this guy says?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6MvcIs4OcQ
He has a PH.D. This is nothing to sneeze at.