Quote:
Originally Posted by Chan
Oh no! Someone dared to criticize one of the politically correct groups. Burn him at the stake!
So, how is this linking gays to Satan?
I can't imagine why "the homosexual agenda" (fighting for special protections as a "sexual minority") is even relevant to a County Commissioner's race.
Since "phobic" means "fear of" and "homo" can mean "man" or "same"... As for this whole "culture war" thing, that may very well be but why is someone running for County Commissioner fighting it? What do the various culture war issues have to do with the job functions of a County Commissioner?
Whine, whine, whine! I'm so damned sick of these perverts whining about every little criticism while they're free to say whatever the hell they want about their enemies. Stop being a bunch of sissies and butch up your act! If there is an issue of the attorney general using his office for political purposes then that may be a valid issue to raise but I really don't know what it would have to do with a race for County Commissioner.
I might see this as reasonable political mudslining if Rinehart were running for Attorney General but what the hell does any of this have to do with running for County Commissioner?
Again, what any of this has to do with being a County Commissioner, I don't know.
Now this is an important issue worth exploring.
If this race were being held in New York State I'd think it was definitely payback.
So, what exactly do homosexualty or the state Attorney General's support of it have to do with how this guy got to be County Commissioner and with why he should be re-elected? This is something I think the voters should be asking.
|
Yeah - I have to agree. It's a weak attempt to escape justice by using a scapegoat to rally support. Maybe if he's county commissioner, he'll be immune to prosecution. 
__________________
Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.
Ernest Benn
|