Quote:
|
However evidence has emerege that indicates that the bombings were actually planned and carried out by British Army special forces the SAS. This means that this was an act of war upon the Republic of Ireland and of course an act of State terror. Of course it also adds to the hypocrasy of Britians participation in the "War on Terror" when they have been responsible for terrorists atrocities themselves.
|
but:
Quote:
|
Barron considers the evidence supporting the view that security forces directly assisted the Dublin and Monaghan attacks. He claims that the only source of allegations that an SAS Brigadier and Captain participated in the attacks came, in 1983, from French journalist Roger Faligot. Barron insists that his inquiry has found no evidence to support this claim.
|
Where do you get from the second quote that the bombings were planned and carried out by the British Army and how do you manage to credit them with total control and planning of this act?
"Assisted"..."participated"..."allegations"... on the word of one reporter and the author insists no evidence supports the claim?
It's conclusive to you? It's a bit of a stretch from here...
In fact, it is just bias, isn't it.