Quote:
Originally Posted by leviathon435
In November 1534 the Act of Supremacy finalised the English break with Rome and confirmed that Henry VIII was the supreme head of the English church, not the Pope. The exact reason for this are not know, be it desire for divorce, the wish for wealth or a real concern from the King about the state of the Church at the time which was rife with corruption both financial and moral. But whatever the reason it was a historic event and whilst it did not mean a break with Catholicism directly it caused a greater accpetance of reformist ideas and eventually England would become a protestant country. All of this would cause many wars and ill-feeling from the continent and it would ultimately shape the face of Britain as it is today, we can clearly see how British culture differs from those found on mainland Europe. So my question is this: was the break from Rome and ultimately the reformationa positive thing leading to more tolerance and possibly even democracy in the long term or was it a negative thing as shown by the immediate religious intolerance created and the warring involved?
|
It was positive because England got itself out from under the control of a foreign power (the Roman Catholic Church). It was negative because it was still government-run religion.
__________________
A panda walks into a cafe. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and fires two shots in the air.
"Why?" asks the confused waiter, as the panda makes toward the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder.
"I'm a panda," he says at the door. "Look it up."
The waiter turns to the relevant entry and, sure enough, finds an explanation.
"Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves."
|