Quote:
Originally Posted by pjohns
This sounds perilously close to the reasoing that established a "right to privacy" in Griswold vs. Connecticut (1965), which served as a basis for the very wobbly intellectual foundation for Roe vs. Wade just eight years later.
|
Actually that is pretty much the reasoning. The Right of Privacy is linked to Abortion. They could have used the Ninth amendment to say you have the right of abortion, but no they used the IX amendment and the privacy interpreted in there to say you have that right. I do have to admit though that the Supreme Court was pulling something out of its *** when it passed this case.
__________________
Non concupisces domum proximi tui; nec desiderabis uxorem eius, non servum, non ancillam, non bowem, non asinum, nec omnia quae illius sunt.
|