This statement's as absurd as saying child abuse is their choice to make. Don't be ridiculous. Whether through stupidity, ignorance, or malice, it is neglectful and harms their children unreasonable. If it kills them, they ought to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and any other children removed from their care and put into state custody. They are a danger to children and unfit parents.

Irrelevant whose kids they are. My neighbour isn't min, but I won't tolerate him murdering people either nor killing people by neglectful behaviour. Moreover, refusing vaccines for bogus reasons hurts society by diminishing herd immunity, putting the health and lives of others at risk. When you begin to impact society, it becomes society's business. Next.




If they die because you deliberately refused to get them sound medical care, it's tantamount to killing them through neglect. If you know what the likely consequences will be anyway, and you continue to do it, you are an unfit parent putting the health of your child in jeopardy. If you kill them by denying them proper medical care, whether you are just stupid or ignorant, you are being neglectful and failing to take reasonable precautions to prevent harm. You're a sick individual that you want parents to be able to effectively kill their children. Then again, you are libertarian. I am not surprised. They have a very poor grasp of ethics.

Did you even bother to think before you typed this out? Apparently not too much. You might as well cut out the b.s. freedom rhetoric and state what you really mean: "parents shouldn't be forced to take care of their kids, and if they kill them, oh well, too bad so sad!" According to this logic, parents shouldn't be held accountable and "forced" to treat their children. If they just don't feel like it, or if they ignore all sound medical care and use 'prayer', and the kid dies, it's all hunky dory. That's retarded, sorry.

__________________