Quote:
Originally Posted by leviathon435
I'm conscious of not wanting to argue for Viv, but I would imagine that her evidence is gained through experience. I don't live under the US constitution, thankfully, but I agree that all are equal. However, I do believe that it is more important for a child to have its Mother than Father and more important to the Mother to have the child. If you want to continue saying, but all are equal, then you may but I want to find the best solution for everyone involved.
|
The best solution for the child is all that matters and we have zero evidence to prove that a woman is better fitted than a man. We have general statements and assumptions that have been thrown out is all. A woman should not have 'more rights' to a child than a man simply because she is a woman. The better parent should have the rights to the child and if both parents are equally capable, then custody should be joint and equal. I've yet to see a compelling argument against this analysis.