12-25-2007, 11:01 AM
|
 |
Congressman
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Userid: 147 Location: Nottingham, England
Age: 17
Posts: 7,118
Rep Power: 9
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by debateman
1. This bond at birth does not guarantee that the mother will be a good parent and thus this is zero indication to the mothers importance. After 9 months of confinement, there is bound to be some sort of bond. Stockholm syndrome.
2) To say that breasts make women more important than man is crazy. We keep going back to this argument. Simply because a woman has breasts does not indicate her relevance. The same is true for the fact that a man has a penis. So?! Biology has little to do with the safety and care issues, it has everything to do with a continuation of the false understand that one gender is some how more important to the child. The MOST important gender to the child is the gender that takes care of, regardless of which gender that be.
|
Read Viv's post, this is the true reason why. I was merely pointing out how biologically women are chosen to be closer parents. If there is a clear difference in who is best parent then go with best parent, but in close situations, where both parents are capable and loving, go with the Mother.
__________________
Trust me, I'm a socialist! 
There's power in a factory,power in the land, power in the hand of the worker. But it all amounts to nothing if together we don't stand, there is power in a union.
The union forever defending our rights, down with the blackleg, workers unite. To our brothers and our sisters in many far off lands, there is power in a union.
Money speaks for money, the devil for his own. - Billy Bragg
|